DNA nanobots can exponentially self-replicate: Tiny machines made from strands of DNA can build copies of themselves, leading to exponential replication. Similar devices could one day be used to cr…::Tiny machines made from strands of DNA can build copies of themselves, leading to exponential replication. Similar devices could one day be used to create drugs inside the body

  • uservoid1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    11 months ago

    Because of this the reaction will not work outside of carefully controlled laboratory conditions, ruling out apocalyptic scenarios where the process runs away and destroys all available DNA by building versions of itself with it.

    This isn’t something that’s taking over the world just yet

    So there’s always that kind of uncertainty; you think you can build safeguards in, but they’re not necessarily a guarantee that it will be safe

    Very reassuring, nothing to worry about

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      You could also have a copycat funded by terrorists or whatever. Just because they build safeguards doesn’t mean the next person will. Fun.

      • ThoGot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s not that they built safeguards but probably more that replication is finicky and you need these specific conditions for it to work at all
        (but I don’t have access to the cited paper)

  • Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    That’s a VIRUS.

    Duh…

    ( yes, I know they are implementation-orthogonal, but it’s the same concept. )

    _ /\ _

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Natures answer to cancer is to let it happen. Just like every other disease.

      The way it eradicates it, is that we eventually all die of it, and the few that survive live on to have immunity. It takes an extremely long time. The major problem is, things like cancer usually happen well beyond the point that we start reproducing.

      Evolution doesn’t really care about things beyond the point of reproduction. I mean, it kinda does, but not in the same way that dropping dead in childhood does.

      Not to mention, humans are actively meddling in evolution. Diseases that would wipe us out are handled with technology now. Meaning we have taken control of a lot of what nature used to do.

        • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Nature didn’t care, it was just an happy accident, a mutation that gave an advantage over others who couldn’t correct errors in replication. So they remained and others died away.

    • Melt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Seeing compression, data decay, cosmic radiation flipping bit, I’m not too confident