• ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I said it last shutdown but does nobody seem to notice that whenever we have a shutdown it’s because Republicans keep shitting their pants and then screaming about the smell?

    Every govt shutdown in my lifetime has been because of Republicans. These shutdowns impact millions of people yet I never see it brought up.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      7 days ago

      They have extremely effective propaganda (fox) that just claims the exact opposite every time it happens and slightly more than half of the country’s land (not people) believe it.

      • UristMcHolland@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        People keep talking about fox news like that’s what the diehard rechugulacans are watching. They listened to their Cheeto dusted emperor and now they watch newsmax.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    If they put human skin on the ventriloquist dummy from goosebumps, let it age 50 years, had its human son monitor it’s web traffic for porn browsing… What would that dummy look like?

  • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    RealID for all. Free at point of service. Do it at the post office right next to the Postal Banking window.

    Done and done.

    • MadBigote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 days ago

      I have always thought that the American voting system is… Odd? I read you need to register every now and then in order to be able to vote? In Mexico we all get an ID issued by the federal government as you turn 18, and it is valid for pretty much anything, including voting. It is valid for years, you can vote as long as you have it on your possession. Updating your address or getting a reposition is free, and we even now allow Mexicans living abroad ( undocumented or not) to vote.

      Granted, the system is not perfect, but I believe an important part of a democracy is to make participating in it as convenient as possible.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        First of all, elections are overseen by each state individually. While there is Federal law involving elections, it’s up to the States to implement them. Due to the Electoral College, the Presidential Election is really a weighted combination of the results of 50 separate State elections (and DC). So ypu can argue that we really don’t have any national elections at all, so each state runs their own.

        Then, there is another complicating factor that there is no one piece of Federal ID that everyone is mandated to have. The closest thing is the Social Security Card, but that isn’t really supposed to be used as ID. Not everyone has a passport, and there is no national ID card. The closest thing we have to a universal ID is the driver’s license, but again that is managed on a state-by-state basis.

        The main argument here is that when someone registers to vote, they must submit proof of residence, but Federal law holds that they do not have to show proof of citizenship. They merely have to attest that they are a citizen, and lying on that form is a crime. Many states object to that. Some go as far as to say that if you do not bring your proof of citizenship whe you register to vote, they will only let you vote in Federal elections, not state ones.

        The fundamental question is: if you know you are a citizen but have lost both your passport and your birth certificate, should you be disenfranchised? Republicans clearly say “yes”.

        • MadBigote@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Here each state organizes their own elections as well, but the same ID is valid for those too.

          Oddly enough, I agree with the Republicans on this one: you should be a citizen in order to vote.

          • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            Oddly enough, I agree with the Republicans on this one: you should be a citizen in order to vote.

            But you already have to be a citizen in order to vote. They’re arguing you need to prove citizenship to register to vote.

            Registering to vote shouldn’t be like applying for a passport. Declaring you are a citizen and facing criminal charges if you lie about it ought to be sufficient, especially given that we do not have any systemic issues with non-citizens voting.

            But of course, Republicans want their base to believe we have systemic issues with non-citizens voting, despite investigation after investigation finding this isn’t the case. Turns out there’s no good reason to potentially get yourself imprisoned or deported just to cast a ballot, and non-citizens aren’t idiots.

            Republicans want to make voting less accessible, because the more disadvantaged a person is the less likely they are to have the time and capacity to bring proof of citizenship to an office to register to vote, rather than just doing it online (as many states will let you do). And limiting voting access is always a winning strategy for conservatives.

      • Donebrach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        It’s not odd when you take into account that the United States was founded with slavery of an entire race as a feature and a culture constantly fighting against the rights and privileges of non-white-males at every single juncture.

        This nation is founded on stolen land (just like Mexico) then the English and French and Spaniards systematically ran them off their original land and murderized them, then the English brought in more foreigners to subjugate instead.

        All to say, this country is founded on immense inhumane violence and we give everyone guns as a response.

        But ya know, gotta fly that confederate flag and be simultaneously pro federal oversight and anti federal oversight because brain-rotted-American-racist. (This is rhetorical, not a personal slight at you, op)

    • LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yup, it’s interesting how so many of these universal ID for voting laws don’t also include an easy, convenient, and free means for all citizens to get IDs.

  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Where is the “mah freedum” and “they are taking away our democracy” crowd now?

  • Corigan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    183
    ·
    8 days ago

    They threaten/shit down the government every other issue… Like a toddler having a tantrum.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      a toddler throws a tantrum when it thinks it can get something it wants from the adult and democrats have a history of giving these toddlers what they wanted when they tantrum-ed hard enough; their current party leader literally used to brag about doing so in his 2020 campaign.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      7 days ago

      “Walkouts allow a relatively small number of lawmakers to nullify the will of the majority, and that is to the detriment of our democracy,” Alejandro Queral, executive director of the Oregon Center for Public Policy, said in an emailed statement.

      There it is. Being a shithead should cost you.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 days ago

        100%. Also fine them for one months salary every time they play this “I just won’t do my job 🤷‍♂️” game. Dont wanna work, dont get paid.

        Unfortunately they all live off corporate kickbacks more than salary but at least some of that can be returned to the coffers.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Do it, yah fucking whinny-ass man-child.

    Shut the fucking government down because you’re afraid of fucking democracy.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I get the sentiment, and am also so, so tired of this. But. It’s an election year and Biden is currently president. In other words, these freaks will absolutely shut down the government, actively harm the economy, and reduce our national security because they can then blame democrats and it will help elect Trump. Please vote, donate, and volunteer accordingly…

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        They would never. They can threaten all they want but what they are really risking is the dollar as the dominant currency. If it becomes commonplace or even somewhat likely that a shutdown can happen, the rest of the world sees that as instability. These fools don’t know what levers they are messing with and the second someone actually pulls it they will shit their pants crying because they made a booboo.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        only idiots see that.

        Everyone else sees that they’re actively fucking everyone over. there’s not enough idiots to sway, if everyone gets out to vote.

  • Icalasari@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    8 days ago

    Dems need to draw a line in the sand here and do some of the campaigning on this

    “They are so afraid that they would rather shut down government than allow votes”

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I suspect the redhats would just interpret the votes being blocked were for “illegals” and that this was a good thing. Because they’ve been told this repeatedly.

          • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            That’s the counterpoint. The data shows that it was already illegal for “illegals” to vote and there are no reported cases of it. However, there are hundreds of cases of republicans using this law to prevent (your) college students from voting. If you have a son or daughter away at college, do they have their birth certificate with them so they can register to vote?

            • ripcord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              Why did you feel the need to make a counterpoint to me pointing out that they don’t care about counterpoints?

              • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                pretty sure Republicans care about counterpoints if their counterpoint to “Republicans are shutting down the govt” is “them illegals!”. The correct reply is “your kids!”

    • actually@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      8 days ago

      I don’t think they are conservatives, although they call themselves that. Democrats are conservatives.

      Classic conservatives conserve: this is a mob who could not individually list one thing they want to keep from changing. They want as much change that makes them the most money

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Preservation of an existing thing and conservative political ideology aren’t actually linked. No matter how much conservatives try to tell you they are. Classic Conservatism was just how 17th and 18th century political philosophers referred to monarchies and top down systems that impose order on the masses. This was in opposition to Classical Liberalism which was a bottom up imposition of order. I.e. by the people, for the people.

        In many ways the South came out of the revolution still subscribed to classical conservatism. They favored a heavy class system, different rules for the elite and workers, and were loathe to expand voting beyond the elite. Even after the civil war they made the antebellum period their golden age. It wasn’t until the post world war 2 era offered Neo-Liberalism that they really gave up trying to go back to the antebellum period. There were even slave-like conditions called peonage right up to the mid 1940s.

        One of the biggest differences in classical conservatism and liberalism was what they called, the state of nature. Liberals saw all men as inherently good, but taught to be evil by oppression and stressful environmental factors. Conservatives saw all men as inherently evil and in need of strong control. Their theories followed pretty well from those base assumptions. Although there was also a healthy dose of Divine Rule in conservatism.

        I’m mentioning this because I hope everyone reading this can realize the Republicans of the cold war, as racist and hateful as they were, were still inside classical liberalism. They still believed in democracy, rule by the people, for the people. Since the end of Bush’s presidency though they’ve increasingly decided classical conservatism is more attractive.

        • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’m mentioning this because I hope everyone reading this can realize the Republicans of the cold war, as racist and hateful as they were, were still inside classical liberalism. They still believed in democracy, rule by the people, for the people.

          Considering the war on drugs I question that. The war on drugs was just the new Jim Crow

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yup. But that was about minorities and leftists. As far as the general disposition of the working class, the Republicans were actually working for their votes. Nixon gave us OSHA as well as the war on drugs.

            Another factor I didn’t mention above is that the Republican party fundamentally changes in the 1960’s because of the Dixie Flip. That’s when they really became the party of the South. Before that the parties were far more mixed around geographically. Which is why I go from talking about the South and conservatives to talking about the Republicans.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        republicans are trying to conserve billionaires money, democrats are trying to conserve the larger federal system. Nobody is trying to fix the system atm.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yes. Lets shut down the government over this. The furloughed workers totally won’t vote democrat in protest.

    • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s worked every other time Republicans have shut down the government. Why wouldn’t they get their way this time?

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 days ago

        Our collective situation may have become so dire that We the People may realize we’ve far more power than what we express at the ballot box.

        Probably not yet. But, possibly soon.

          • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            By numbers, one third will advocate. One third will do nothing. One third will object. About ten percent will sacrifice to lead the rest. We could argue with history. But, that’d be dumb.