• AbsentBird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    If you own a house with nobody living in it, you gotta pay rent to the state each month for the privilege of keeping it empty.

    • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      They do this in India. You’re allowed 2 homes, 3rd onwards you have to pay Income tax for deemed rent received if it’s empty.

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        No, like market rate for the property. Everyone pays property tax, regardless of whether the property is vacant or occupied.

        • Nick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          My dad inherited my grandma’s ancient house recently and is practically forced to find a way to remodel it to be rentable because there is a imputed rental value tax where I’m from.

          • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            What’s the alternative, just leave it empty?

            I would think it could also be acceptable to transfer ownership to a relative who doesn’t already own a home. It just seems like a waste to have a house with nobody living in it while so many people are unhoused.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      After a while, it’s just part of the cost.

      Not much of an expense imo. Like giving a speeding ticket to a billionaire, it doesn’t actually mean much if you’re rich enough.

      Id rather make the initial purchase cost extraordinarily expensive after buying more than two houses. Third house is 5x the cost. Fourth house is 50x the cost. Nobody needs four houses so it’s a fuck you tax.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        And at scale it will eat into investor returns, making holding them empty a less profitable endeavor. They would suddenly go from having a neutral MRR asset turned into a negative MRR if they choose not to rent out. You can bet your sweet bippy that the bean counters are going to notice the difference and argue to sell or rent them to cut the expenses.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Motherboard front panel connectors should be officially standardized. These fucking things have been basically the same since the 90s, but we still have to line up all the individual wires instead of having one plug.

    Oh, and fix RGB headers while we’re at it. They’re the flimseist fucking thing, and you shouldn’t be able to use a 4 pin plug on a three pin header.

  • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    My car makes it slightly difficult to change lanes if I don’t signal, some resistance on the steering wheel and a warning beep beep beep that I’m “drifting.” There are some terrible roads around here that confuse the sensors so I do a bit of steering wheel arm wrestling now and then just to keep going straight.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      That is why I turned lane assist off after a dozen false positives that felt like the car was going to steer me into danger with no benefits.

      Parking assist got turned off when parking in a garage set off a cacophony.

      • whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        It was when I was holding leftmost lane position passing a semi and it beeped and tried to steer me into said semi that I decided it can fuck off for ever lol

  • Darohan@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    The more properties you own, the more tax you pay on the price of the next one - excluding if you only own one, but escalating quickly after like 3 or 4.

    • Kayana@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Possible formula: Tax for n-th house = n-th Fibonacci number + 5 * max(0, n - 2). So low numbers like three get penalized by that linear part, and high numbers grow exponentially due to the Fibonacci number.

      • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ok now it’s starting to get confusing enough to fit into our tax system. Can we add more variables? Lol

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    All adult sex work should be legal across the board. Anyone, of legal age, should be allowed to not only sell their services but they should be able to pay taxes and be allowed to unionize and collect benefits from any organization they work for (brothels).

    A lot of the people in this world who are messed up in the head just need to get laid, and those doing to dirty work should be celebrated and rewarded for their efforts. I genuinely think this would make the world a better place.

    • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      That is pretty much how it is in Germany. Illegal (outside of the regulation avoiding taxes) and forced prostitution is still a huge problem. There is just way too much money to be made in that business…

      I personally prefer the Nordic models therfore.

  • credit crazy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Considering I see some people mentioning stuff like swerving to avoid obstacles or temporary construction lanes not to mention curvey roads so I propose what about automatic turn signals that activate when it detects the driver trying to turn without signaling

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because, and I have no idea why so many people don’t get this, you’re supposed to signal you’re going to turn, then slow down, then turn. That’s how you safely let anyone behind you know you’re going to do that.

      I can’t tell you how many times I’ve almost rear-ended someone because they weren’t using their turn signals until they had already started turning. You might as well not use them at all for all the good that does.

      Which is why it’s an incredibly dumb idea. It’s not actually possible. But it would make the world a better place.

      • AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        A few days ago I ran out to get a few things, and this car ahead of me is going 20Km/h below the 50 limit for 5 minutes, then comes to a dead stop in an intersection, starts slowly turning and then puts on their blinker. Honked at them for being a fucking dumbass and they just wave me off like I’m the asshole

        God I fucking hate how easy it is to get and keep a license. Enforcement needs to be much stricter because there are far too many morons on the road.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          i want to live in a world where only those who truly have no other option choose to drive, and even a minor mistake in traffic immediately costs you your license and you have to re-take it from scratch.

          It’s insane to just let anyone drive a multi-ton vehicle capable of going 120+ km/h for personal transport, if people are going to do so they damn well better do so carefully.

          • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            even a minor mistake in traffic immediately costs you your license

            Well that’s dumbest thing I’ve heard in a while. Just say you want to eliminate all cars and be done with it. No human being could meet that standard, because even the best drivers make a minor mistake once in a while. Won’t even get into reacting to an emergency where you have a split second to decide what to do. We are not omniscient robots.

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Instantaneous, lifelong driving bans for any driver who is found to be texting or intoxicated behind the wheel.

    • Persen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I respectfully disagree. People, who depend on cars for their job would lose the license and their job, making them drink more.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You spectacularly missed the point of DUI law. Society couldn’t give two shits if someone is drinking themselves to an early grave. It’s when they endanger other people that it becomes an issue. That’s why it’s driving under the influence, not existing.

        Many countries will judge a DUI induced kill a murder, because the person who chooses to drink and drive knows that killing someone is a probable outcome and chose to do it anyway.

      • philipsdirk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I respectfully disagree. People that cannot bring up the discipline to drive sober and keep their attention on the road, even if their jobs would depend on it, shouldn’t have the privilege of being allowed to operate a machine that can easily kill when making a mistake or misjudgment.

      • shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Respectfully, so what? If you drive for your livelihood then it’s your own damn fault if you get banned from it for doing something illegal.

      • stormeuh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Agreed, and I respectfully disagree with everyone else replying to you.

        Relying on your car for your job is a much wider criterion than driving as your job. In car-centric places like the US (outside of the big cities) that’s probably 99% of the population. Couple that with the piss poor social safety net and losing your license literally means starvation.

        This still doesn’t mean I endorse or agree with people driving distracted in any way. If revoking someone’s license meant removing them from the road but not destroying their life, I would do that in a heartbeat.

    • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think you should be allowed one sign on the building itself and a listing in some sort of directory and that’s it.

    • flerp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I always wished there was a karma system where every time you litter, when you get home what you littered is in your bed waiting for you. I would love the result for CEOs whose companies dump oil or toxic waste.

  • hglman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    If you need other cars to use turn signals you shouldn’t be driving.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because people are supposed to have the psychic ability to predict what the driver in front of them is going to do?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      That sounds like it would be a good idea, but there is a strange but significant cadre of right-wing Star Trek fans. I think they just pay attention to the pew pew space battles and ignore everything else or something.

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I honestly see why. While I love star trek, it has a very strong power structure “with the right people in power”, as if power itself wouldn’t corrupt people. The admirals may not always be right in the beginning but they accept their wrongs and have no bad intentions and the heroes are always celebrated by the establishment.

        This can be understood as “this is the perfect world where even authorities are good” or as “I told you, authorities are the good guys”. I, as a left libertarian, prefer Farscape (and still watch every star trek show)