• metaStatic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      exactly, it would be trivial to have a whitelist server side and now only ad friendly apps can access the videos. they only still work because it’s worth keeping those viewers in the system for the time being.

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        9 months ago

        Technically NewPipe simply parses the website and is seen as a web browser from YouTube’s point of view.

        That how they bypass the API’s TOS, they don’t use it.

      • Feyd@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        Trivial? What information does this whitelist hold that can’t be spoofed? It’s not like apps have to tell the truth about what they are.

        • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          People do that? Just have their code go on the internet and tell lies?! This is a Christian internet!

          (yes it’s /s)

        • passepartout@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          This is what current implementations like Revanced do. The endgame will be fullblown DRM. Until then, it will be a cat and mouse game.

      • eluvinar@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        exactly, it would be trivial to have a whitelist server side and now only ad friendly apps can access the videos. they only still work because it’s worth keeping those viewers in the system for the time being.

        It’s not trivial to make sure over the network on a device you don’t control that you’re talking with an app you think you are talking with. Just look how multiplayer games fail to combat cheaters and resort to kernel anticheats, and then still fail to assure the players are actually using the legit application. It’s actually pretty much impossible in any open ecosystem, maybe possible on something like chromecast where you get to control almost anything (as long as someone doesn’t hack it to run custom firmware, like they do with every console ever).

        Not only is this impossible, it always makes the experience for your legit users worse (but hey, if they are fine with the level of ads on yt today they probably don’t care if google were to mine bitcoins on their phones).