• masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    No need to scream like an idiot.

    Again… there is no such thing as a “radicalized” Nazi. If you do not understand what is meant by the term radicalized, I will be happy to explain it to you.

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        The term “radical” has a distinct meaning when it comes to the political - the term literally means “that which pertains to the root.” Ie, radical politics are politics which looks for the root causes of society’s ills. That is why radical politics is almost universally associated with left-wing politics. *Reactionary politics," on the other hand, is almost universally associated with right-wing politics - ie, ideologies that wants to prevent politics that attempts to cure the root causes of society’s ills. Right-wing ideology is always anti-radical - that is the entire point of right-wing ideology, has always been and always will be.

        In other words… the only one way for a nazi to be a “radical nazi” - and that’s by becoming an ex-nazi.

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah but you knew full well that that is not what radicalized meant in sentence. /:

          Givng off a lot of pedantic vibes here

          • masquenox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            When someone tries to convince me that the moon is made out of cheese I do not forget what cheese is just to spare the convincer’s feelings.

            Your misuse of important political meanings doesn’t make it less misinformational just because it’s misuse is something you’ve heard done on mainstream media.

            • Dontfearthereaper123@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              It sorta does actually. Language evolves and its extremely common to have entirely different colloquial and academic definitions

              • masquenox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Language evolves and its extremely common to have entirely different colloquial and academic definitions

                The meaning of political concepts do not change - it doesn’t matter how desperately CNN wants to sell their “both-side-ism” bullcrap to you.

                • Dontfearthereaper123@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I dont watch the news lmao but yes they do change umm thats how language works I’m not really sure what to tell u here do u think were still speaking Latin or what? With the internet especially language started to change faster

                  • masquenox@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    but yes they do change

                    No. They don’t - no matter how desperately you want them to. The basic idea behind socialism hasn’t changed. The basic idea behind democracy hasn’t changed.

                    You just want them to have changed so that you don’t have to account for the fact that you bought the bullshit for the sake of convenience.

                    I’m not really sure what to tell u here

                    That’s because you have no argument.

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Hmmm. Do you always disambiguate word meanings by first taking them out of context and then applying some textbook definition you like?

              I clearly meant this: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43783789

              Even people writing papers on this use this word to mean that in this context.

              I’m not denying other meanings exist. I’m just saying that you’re kinda being a jerk to get UMMM-ACTUALLYYY smart-points. In your head. They are only in your head my dude.

              • masquenox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Even people writing papers

                And? There are people “writing papers” that still think the USSR was “socialist” or that the US is “democratic.”

                Political concepts have meaning, genius - that meaning doesn’t change just because said meaning upsets the feels of liberals such as yourself, okay?

                • ???@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  And what? Radicalization can mean different things in context. What do you think was the context when talking about this violence cycle? Could it have been like that example from that paper, a widely used definition by both academics and non academics?

                  • masquenox@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Radicalization can mean different things in context.

                    Oh really? So why do liberals peddling their bootlicker ideology in mainstream media choose to only use the term in that specific context, hmm?

                    You never find fascists self-applying the terms “radical” or “radicalized”… that’s something only leftists do. Yet you liberals constantly ignore that context, don’t you?

                    Why is that, liberal?