The company, Tuff Torq, was fined nearly $300,000 for hiring 10 children. It must also set aside $1.5 million to help the immigrant minors who were illegally employed.

Immigrant children as young as 14 were found working illegally amid dangerous heavy equipment at a Tennessee firm that makes parts for lawn mowers sold by John Deere and other companies, according to Labor Department officials.

The company, Tuff Torq, was fined nearly $300,000 for hiring 10 children. As part of a consent agreement with the federal government, the company is also required to set aside $1.5 million to help the children who were illegally employed. Ryan Pott, general counsel for Tuff Torq’s majority owner, the Japanese firm Yanmar, acknowledged the violations to NBC News.

  • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    $300k is a joke. Every manager should be in prison and the factory should be nationalized. Keep the legit (adult) employees there, and transition the business to worker ownership.

    Do that a few times and you’ll see some changes in how businesses behave.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Wow!

      300k is so cheap to commit child labor! What an “affordable fee” to pay children like $5/hr and put them in dangerous situations. Best of all, they don’t know any better and you just lie to them!

      Yay thank you America!!!

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Don’t need to nationalize it. Turn it into a cooperative instead. Every worker owns shares within the company. Profits are shared.

      • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s the “transition to worker ownership” part. IANAL but I think that the government taking it over might be a necessary intermediate step if you’re compelling transition to a co-op.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Google tells me:

        Tuff Torq has 513 employees, and the revenue per employee ratio is $311,891. Tuff Torq peak revenue was $160.0M in 2023.

        They were fined $300,000. So less than one employees’ worth of revenue.

        Cost of doing business, as usual.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Fined $300K, but also have to give up $1.5M in profit for the 10 kids. $150,000 per kid, or, you know, 1/2 of the revenue they generated. ;)

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Well I’m sure a company with ethics, like John Deere probably, will stop doing business with Tuff Torq now. Definitely.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              No, they’ll just re-negotiate their contract to get a better deal causing Tuff Torque to treat their remaining employees worse.

              • BossDj@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Or owner bankrupts tuff torq, gives himself a termination bonus, then makes a new LLC called Tough Tork

        • Sidyctism@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Could you explain what exactly “revenue per employee ratio” means? My thought would be that this is the value the average employee creates for the company minus the cost of employment per year, is that correct?

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Revenue is all the money the company makes, before any costs

            Revenue per employee is that amount divided by the number of employee

            The after costs amount would be profit per employee

      • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Whoever signed off on hiring literal children should be held accountable. Actually holding these people to accountability is the only way this is getting solved

      • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’d think since companies are people they’d be thrown in jail or something.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh but c’mon, it’s a country where undiagnosed schizophrenics have the freedom to buy semi-automatic firearms, proudly rapist lying bankrupt fraudsters can become the president and guns are the leading cause of death for children!

      What’s not to like?

      • Carlo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Listen, we can’t all live in Finland, mate. This is just rubbing it in. And you over there with your tall treetops and loffy mountains.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Actually, there’s not a single mountain in the whole country.

          Norway wanted to give us one but it didn’t work out in the end.

          Also, compared to American Redwoods, our trees really aren’t that tall.

          So it’s more like us over here with our thick, short forests and our potato fields.

  • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Imagine how insanely productive kids must be at repetitive tasks. And it’s not like they have been exposed to the labour struggles, they’ll have to figure it out all of that on their own.

  • Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Companies found using child labor should have their business license revoked and forced to liquidate.

      • LucidNightmare@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Just thinking about some shitstain CEOs having to work an actual job instead of tea parties and coke and hookers, makes my day so much brighter. Thank you.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yup. Republicans claim they want to close the border, but have no problem exploiting the labor supply.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    “The Labor Department has prioritized child labor enforcement since last spring amid a 152% increase in children found to be illegally employed since 2018, according to department figures.”

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Of course they are. Why else would you oppose immigration, except to be able to exploit illegal immigrants?

          By virtue of being here unlawfully, they have little recourse. That fact alone is essentially leverage for any “employer” to exploit them over.

          It’s clearly not because they are a drain on the system, because that’s been disproven time and time again. Their economic contributions far outweigh whatever little social programs they’re able to obtain.

          So it must be because they are a great pool of cheap, under-the-table, sub-minimum-wage, exploitable labor. Just like prisoners and prostitutes (except for the sans sub-minimum wage part. Plenty of illicit sex workers that are unpaid victims of trafficking, but if the John is paying less than $7.25 an hour, they should really know better)

          • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            By virtue of being here unlawfully, they have little recourse. That fact alone is essentially leverage for any “employer” to exploit them over.

            Ah yes, keep your employees at least as culpable as yourself, and thus exploitable. These are mob tactics. Hey, maybe slapping these monsters with a RICO suit is the way to go here?

            • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Mobsters didn’t have Citizens United.

              If CU were around in the 1920s, we’d still be in prohibition.

  • PopcornPrincess@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    “Pott, the general counsel for Tuff Torq’s majority owner, said the child workers were temporary and were not hired directly by Tuff Torq. He said they used fake names and false credentials to obtain jobs through a temporary staffing agency, and said Tuff Torq is ‘transitioning’ away from doing business with the staffing company.” They’re just passing the blame now that they got caught; otherwise, I’m sure they’d continue to turn a blind eye.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, they didn’t stop and go… “The staffing agency says you’re 18, I don’t buy it. Where’s your ID?”

  • Tilgare@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m sure Tennessee law makers will be sure to rectify this soon - they’ll go ahead and loosen child labor laws more and more so their benefactors remain happy.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Tennessee: old enough to make assembly line lawn mower parts

    Florida: not old enough for social media.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, they are 2 positions removed here… Staffing company illegally supplied the kids to a 3rd party supplier of John Deere.

      It would be like, I dunno, someone hiring illegal employees for a glass company selling bottles to Coca Cola.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Place I was at just had multiple people working on the same name. X was the official employee and X officially works 80 hours a week. X is two people one of which doesn’t have papers.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    So I was a teenager in the early 2000s and many, many of my teenage classmates including myself had jobs. Some full time some part time.

    Personally I worked at a paper mill from the age of 15 until I moved out of state.

    But the minimum age was 14 to be able to work at that time.

    I’ve just been seeing a lot of posts like this indicating young teenage children working and I don’t see why this is all of the sudden an issue?

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Employing illegal underage migrant workers is definitely a problem and needs to be addressed.

        And I’m not angry not sure why you interpreted my comment in that capacity.

        I simply posed a question why employing teenagers has suddenly become an issue. Apparently people found my question offensive and assumed a position that I don’t hold.

        My question wasn’t directly commenting on the article cited in this post but was in general since I have seen multiple posts indicating that more companies are employing more teenage workers not necessarily illegal migrant workers.

        My question is why is this suddenly a problem since employing teenagers has been something that has been going on in this country since its conception.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Times change. I was running a forklift at 14 and working construction at 16. Society has decided that it isn’t the way it wants things to happen anymore.

      I imagine you are reading more stories because the economic downturn has pushed more families to do this.

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I guess the point I’m trying to make is that teenagers have always been working this isn’t a new phenomenon that has just now started to happen regardless of how many teenagers are working even if that number has increased.

        I’ve seen some legislation in recent years where they dropped the minimum wage to work down which I don’t agree with but other than that where’s the problem here that’s what I’m asking?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I guess the point I’m trying to make is that teenagers have always been working this isn’t a new phenomeno

          “People have always kept slaves, so there’s nothing wrong with slavery.” The sentiment of people like you a couple of hundred years ago.

          • mechoman444@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Ever heard of a false equivalency? Because your above statement is a text book definition.

            Also go fuck yourself for inferring that I somehow support slavery and for comparing legally employing teenagers and compensating them for their labor to buying, selling and torturing human beings and making them work for free.

            (I understand that the company in the post was illegally employing underage migrants. I’m making a general statement concerning the entire teenage work force in American.)

            There’s nothing wrong with employing teens within a set of standards and reason.

    • Leviathan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You ever seen a kid get killed in heavy machinery? Have you ever seen a kid get permanently maimed on heavy machinery? That shit changes you. As a society we’re all supposed to learn from those horrors but instead we stay real myopic and say I’ve never been hurt, I’ve never seen anything bad happen and ignore that all regulations were written in blood and lifelong trauma. Then there’s the myriad situations where migrant children can be abused because they’re low risk victims.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Right now 14 year olds just look at phones and go on social media which is a direct harm. Working would be more healthy for their body and their mind.

            • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              we’re exploited enough as is and corporate greed is only getting worse, there’s absolutely zero need to put children in a position to be exploited.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  What the fuck? You think employees should be exploited because they need money to survive? Force them to work 80-hour weeks for minimum wage? Scream racist epithets at them if they aren’t productive enough? How about beat them with a metal rod if they step out of line?