• Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        … You don’t realize that commercial entities have always built space craft for the government, so nothing you’re saying has any credibility. You should probably know something about the topic before arguing about it.

    • hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      “NASA already exists” if his team is doing something never done before and very helpful, that is evidence for the necessity of other space companies besides NASA.

      Edit: just so we’re clear, I don’t give two shits about Elaine Mosk.

          • tetris11@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            You need to provide counterpoints for why their comment on why space tech is unneccesary in saving the planet, otherwise people will think that you have either nothing to say, or worse still, that you think living in space is an achievable reality for your descendants (no, they won’t be part of the super rich elite)

      • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        NASA isn’t a company, and they’ve always paid contractors to make their vehicles. Crucially, noone is doing anything that hasn’t been done before.