Some people, communicating via satellite phones, have described the attack as the “heaviest bombardment yet,” according to independent journalist Sharif Kouddous.

“People can’t call ambulances or civil defense. We are being bombed in an unprecedented manner,” said an unidentified journalist at a Gaza hospital, according to a translation by The Nation’s Palestinian correspondent, Mohammed El-Kurd. “The sky around us just lights up [with explosions], and no one knows what’s going on.”

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    But is that actually true? A lot can be gained from killing your enemies and taking their stuff.

    I’m not saying it’s right in any way, but the motivation should be as clear as any motivation ever has been.

    • 000999@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Violence is the most direct and effective method of control, of obtaining and maintaining power.

      And that is why nation states have a monopoly on it

      • hatedbad@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        and it’s also why the propaganda machine always pushes the “violence is not the answer” narrative

        • idoubledo@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          So your logic is stop Israel’s “violence”, but let Palestinians continue with their “resistance”?

          • Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just BROADLY speaking, the pro Palestinian take right now is that Israel should be removed and Palestine given all of the territory.

            Like, that’s the take. They don’t just want an end to the violence - Israel wants that too. Hamas has been dedicated to the destruction of Jews and Israel for basically forever.

            So it’s asymmetrical.

            The pro Israel take is “destroy Hamas so that these attacks stop and there can be peace.” But it’s important to note that up until the October 7 attack Israel only wanted peace. This new policy is a reaction to an unprecedented attack.

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know if the leader of Hamas dropped 4x legendary skins, 2X xp multiplier and $30 worth of in game currency a teenager would have them dead by morning.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That era ended after WWII, that’s not how it works anymore… Anything worthwhile gets destroyed and polluted if you fight with modern arms

      We’ve gotten more advanced - now, you can make billions through the act of war itself! If you position yourself correctly through investments, you too can drink from the firehouse of money aimed at the military industrial complex whenever war occurs

    • tetraodon@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Achieved for whom? We’ve been following this advice since, well, forever. And yes, the elite might gain some material or political advantage from winning a war, but it’s a losing game for most.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When’s the last time a soldier forced his way into your home and told you to bring him food or he’d kill you?