

Also, not super creative. You’d think fascists would have a different gameplan after 100 years of coming into the scene.
But no. This is Italy in the 1920’s all over again.
Haven’t we already done this before? Show us something new.
Also, not super creative. You’d think fascists would have a different gameplan after 100 years of coming into the scene.
But no. This is Italy in the 1920’s all over again.
Haven’t we already done this before? Show us something new.
This feels a lot like a bachelor party thing
Rebase would mean only one of those two things is real and true in the history, and it’s whatever the last thing was. The other one has no SHA or commits in history anywhere anymore and is essentially erased whenever the gitlog
does a gc
.
Merging is correct I believe (at least in this context), as you alluded to. But a rebase means only one version of summer exists, not another summer. And there’s no record of that first summer ever existing after a -f
push.
Presumably, at some point they needed a real life reference to make the first dummy from.
So…
Careful, we might make him smarter.
That’s all an air fryer really is. It just lifts the material up into a basket so it can circulate air quickly around it to “fry” it with air.
Otherwise it’s almost identical to a convection setting on an oven.
Oh they do, but only if you’re a migrant or trans.
Non anon government plant
And your question is still fundamentally flawed.
We don’t get to vote for a candidate for the US of A that has the Palestinian people at the front of their agenda.
The Palestinian people who are not US citizens do not get a vote at all. Those that are US citizens chose to throw away their vote so they’re in the same camp as those who are not US citizens for the sake of the conversation/argument.
So, of the candidates that were presented, you have to choose the lesser of the two Evils (LEV) to have the greatest chance of accomplishing your goals, even if none of the options specifically further your goals. It’s about limiting the fallout/damage to your goals as much as possible.
This is something the Palestinian people who were US citizens chose not to do.
It is now why they are facing a much more serious threat from the US than they were during Biden’s administration. This is not to absolve the Biden/Harris administration, but to show that the reason things are worse now, is because, in large part, the Palestinian people who were US citizens chose the worse of the two options by not exercising their right to vote.
At no point in the process was there an option that would have accomplished what the Palestinian people would have wanted. To let the greater evil win because of that is going to be a very, very painful lesson for everyone involved, and I feel for the Palestinian people that are now going to be guaranteed to lose their home, their rights, and their freedoms because the new US Administration has even less respect and care for their rights than Biden’s.
So, back to your question.
The flaw is in assuming there was another option other than the LEV scenario playing out, and that the Palestinian people who were not US citizens had a vote here. They did not. They do not have enough power, militaristicly speaking, to have autonomy over their own region, and are unfortunately at the mercy of Israel and their close allies (e.g. the USA right now), to control their fate/future.
They had some influence, in the form of Palestinian Americans and allies who could have voted and chosen a less evil/less terrible path ahead, and they flubbed things in the name of making a point. A point that has had little to no impact, and in fact has galvanized a lot of Americans and the world against them because their poor decision during the US election is going to affect everyone in the world. There is nowhere they can run to, or will be safe from the reach of trump’s US imperialism.
Your question is therefore flawed. It assumes the Palestinian people had any option other than Kamala to give them the best possible scenario forward. To claim otherwise is to be ignorant of the world, and the facts of the situation. Just because we all agree that having “no choice” sucks and isn’t fair, doesn’t mean refusing to vote and letting the worst option (by far) on the table win is anything more than disappointingly idiotic.
And that’s where we’re at now.
That’s correct. This is what they want. Drive stocks down, do a bunch of buybacks, scrap the tariffs, watch line go back up, profit.
This is such a thought terminating question being posed in bad faith.
You can respect and support the Palestinian people, and still realize that Harris was the best option for the Palestinians we had on the table. To not vote was giving a vote to trump, and trump is significantly worse than Harris for the Palestinians, this is objective truth, we have the facts in front of us right now.
Not voting was essentially voting against the Palestinian people.
Is it fair that we had the choices we had in November? No.
But the protest vote just turned into voting for this century’s Mussolini and a guy who’s doing his damnedest to start WW3.
Which seems…antithetical to the purpose of the protest vote? So who really won here?
To seize their assets as “state” assets after their deaths. It’s a somewhat common tactic of fascist regimes to treat their oligarchs as piggy banks.
Anytime you need some more money for the “state” (aka the dictator’s pockets), you knock off an oligarch and seize their assets.
Like Australia. Nukes would only make everything there stronger.
I did nazi that coming
Go to bed early. Easiest trick in the world.
You can also drink a bit of fluids before bed so your body naturally wakes up fairly early, the old Native American trick.
With this administration? Very unlikely.
Different servers have different rules and federation lets them enforce it in a fully distributed and discrete way.
This is how the internet should work. Think of each host as a BBS forum, each one has its own rules. Don’t like it? Go to the other.
The nice thing about the Fediverse, is that you’re not locked in to one server/set of rules.
trump is the shit that landed on the board
If they don’t spend 700 billion on this, the “proxy” war with Russia (that is currently “cheap” for most of Europe to support), will cost them far, far, far, far more than 700 billion in a few short years/months.
This is why you support proxy wars when they’re in your interest.
It’s like outsourcing a future war to a country that won’t touch your shores.
Ukraine is getting fucked up by Russia right now. Mines, bombs, guns, battle, towns destroyed, infrastructure disruptions, etc.
You want that contained in Ukraine as much as possible. The second they lose, it will spill out into all of Europe and will be far more expensive and too late to contain.