UPDATE 10/4 6:47 EDT

I have been going through all the comments. THANKS!!! I did not know about the techniques listed, so they are extremely helpful. Sorry for the slow update. As I mentioned below, I got behind with this yesterday so work cut into my evening.

I ran a port scan. The first syntax, -p, brought no joy. The nmap software itself suggested changing to -Pn. That brought an interesting response:

nmap -Pn 1-9999 <Local IP Addr>

Starting Nmap 7.93 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2024-10-04 11:44 BST Failed to resolve “1-9999”. Nmap scan report for <Local IP Address> Host is up (0.070s latency). All 1000 scanned ports on 192.168.0.46 are in ignored states. Not shown: 990 filtered tcp ports (no-response), 10 filtered tcp ports (host-unreach)

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 6.03 seconds

Just to be absolutely sure, I turned off my work computer (the only windows box on my network) and reran the same syntax with the same results.

As I read this, there is definitely something on my network running windows that is not showing up on the DHCP.

  • Kelly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Home network or corporate?

    Its a windows server, if you are using widows too you can try establishing a RDP connection with Remote Desktop Connection.

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It is a home network. Configured by someone who understands the basics, but is mostly following recipeies rather than having deep knowledge.

      • Kelly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Eyeballing the login screen may give some insight, you’re right that its probably unwise to try real creds if you don’t recognize the server.