🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 5 months agoAnon is an allysh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10
arrow-up13arrow-down1imageAnon is an allysh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 5 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareRoflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agoLet’s crunch the numbers, would it be financially sensible to pay for m to f transition of Employees, so you can pay them less in the long run?
minus-squaregeneral_kitten@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoWith 27% pay cut and the employee having a 3000/month salary and them working a decade in most cases yes
minus-squareTaalnazi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkNederlandsarrow-up1·11 days agoHold up, doesn’t that depend on the transition costs?
Let’s crunch the numbers, would it be financially sensible to pay for m to f transition of Employees, so you can pay them less in the long run?
With 27% pay cut and the employee having a 3000/month salary and them working a decade in most cases yes
Hold up, doesn’t that depend on the transition costs?
Now this is businessing!