alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoClose to 2,000 Environmental Activists Killed Over Last Decadee360.yale.eduexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1126arrow-down11
arrow-up1125arrow-down1external-linkClose to 2,000 Environmental Activists Killed Over Last Decadee360.yale.edualphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squareSMITHandWESSON@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down6·edit-21 year ago no, it’s not even technically correct. You can technically have a carbon negative footprint on the planet Lol, really? I’m pretty sure you’re not able to contribute to global warming after death…Unless you’re a fucking necromancer!!! So the proper Equation would take what they would have contributed if they were alive, and you add that as savings!!! PS: If you’re a necromancer and you haven’t reanimated the dead environmentalist back to life, you’re just a fucking dick.🤨
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoyes, as you can actively do stuff to remove carbon from the air. you can’t do that when you’re dead
Lol, really?
I’m pretty sure you’re not able to contribute to global warming after death…Unless you’re a fucking necromancer!!!
So the proper Equation would take what they would have contributed if they were alive, and you add that as savings!!!
PS: If you’re a necromancer and you haven’t reanimated the dead environmentalist back to life, you’re just a fucking dick.🤨
yes, as you can actively do stuff to remove carbon from the air. you can’t do that when you’re dead