• mrvictory1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    In 2 interviews, the interviewees claim that the investors may lose faith in return of investment if “the killer application of AI” is not available in 18 months. In other words, if the AI is a bubble, my interpretation is that it will burst in only 18 months. EDIT: I am referring to the actual paper https://www.goldmansachs.com/intelligence/pages/gs-research/gen-ai-too-much-spend-too-little-benefit/report.pdf?ref=404media.co

    • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      Financially? Yeah, AI is a bubble for sure. Gobs of money are being poured in with few results to show for it. That bubble will burst. But just like the dotcom bubble, that doesn’t mean the technology is useless or won’t change the world, just not instantly over night with a single investment, which is what the investment groups expect.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        This technology requires finance. You can’t train a model without millions of dollars.

        If the money goes the technology is dead until the cost of the training machines comes down a few orders of magnitude.

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          At least in the US, the research is fairly isolated from capital markets. The military pours huge amounts of money into research on new tech like this, often over ambitiously and with no real expectation of short term returns. Even if there is a financial bubble burst that shuts down a lot of the commercial operations, universities and military contractors will continue working and publishing papers improving the state of the art until industry decides it’s time to try commercializing it again. It’s the basic pattern that has brought us most of the major tech innovations in the US.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      That seems like a fair assumption. I would argue we are at the peak of the bubble and only recently we’ve seen the suits (Goldman Sachs and more broadly analysts at banks) start asking questions about ROI and real use cases.