• frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      There’s no such thing as “ASAP” for nuclear power. If you had the permits signed off today, it would take 10 years before a single GWh of new nuclear energy goes to the grid.

      Instead, maybe we shouldn’t build giant spherical advertising displays?

      • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        There’s no such thing as “ASAP” for nuclear power

        Sure there is. It’s just that the P stands for “20 years from now.”

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Vegas is almost entirely powered by the hoover dam. It’s already pretty green as far as energy goes. The question will be where do they get their power from in a few years when lake mead dries up.

      • HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s not true. The Hoover Dam contributes to Vegas’s power supply, but it’s nowhere near “almost entirely powered” by the dam, except in Fallout: New Vegas.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Fallout: New Vegas is powered by my ever dwindling sanity. I am currently trying to get my mods to play nice.

          Also its implied ingame that only the strip is powered by the damn dam and that Freeside and West Vegas get either limited or no power, hence why directing the electricity from Helios One to the area is such a big deal.

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        In addition to the other thing, dams have a dramatic and disastrous impact on the ecology in the immediate area and the entire riparian system they connect to. It’s “green” in terms of emissions but they’re still harmful and we should be phasing them out for lower impact alternatives as much as possible.

        • rogue_scholar@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Should? Definitely, but let’s be realistic, we can barely get people off of coal and oil right now.

          In the world we live in, Dams have some of the lowest environmental impact compared to the other places we get our energy.

          So we probably shouldn’t be trying to phase them out while there are much more severe effects being felt from the other base load facilities.