A Black man has filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against a hotel in Detroit, Michigan, alleging the hotel only offered him a job interview after he changed the name on his resume, according to a copy of the lawsuit obtained by CNN.

Dwight Jackson filed the lawsuit against the Shinola Hotel on July 3, alleging he was denied a job when he applied as “Dwight Jackson,” but later offered an interview when he changed his name to “John Jebrowski.”

The lawsuit alleges Jackson was denied a job in “violation of Michigan Elliott Larsen Civil Rights Act.”

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    And the prospect already got employed at a different business that had an open vacancy, congrats you’ve got NOTHING by hiring in advance and you also wasted the prospects time.

    Just because there are other businesses that do this scummy tactic doesn’t mean it’s right or less scummy.

    Also, hiring on advance because someone would quit or would be fired so you need to have a roster to replenish them, says A LOT about your business and its climate.

    • daltotron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      And the prospect already got employed at a different business that had an open vacancy, congrats you’ve got NOTHING by hiring in advance and you also wasted the prospects time.

      no no, you see, it’s ethical, because there’s always a revolving door of unemployed people, who somehow don’t have bad hygiene, and are always dressed appropriately, and this tactic works because they exist, and we’re just doing them a service, really. don’t ask questions as to why or how that revolving underclass of desperate unemployed people exist, that’s not allowed.

    • UmeU@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Having fresh resumes is a tactic that allows us to be more flexible with employee schedules. With a staff of 20 people, maybe two per year turn over. I don’t know what you mean about hiring in advance… We hire when we need someone and we have a good number of people to choose from, that way we aren’t stuck with hiring the first applicant that comes along, which inevitably causes more work for the rest of the employees when we don’t get a good hire.

      We don’t have that problem because we keep a fresh stack of resumes.

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        We don’t have that problem because we keep a fresh stack of resumes.

        Dude FFS those are actual people, not just resumes.

        • UmeU@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yea I know, and when we hire them we take good care of them. What’s the problem?

          • macniel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            so much good care that you need to prepare for them to spontaneously quit the job or have to fire them? Yeah sure…

          • CandleTiger@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            The problem is that sending in a resume and applying for a job takes effort. If you invite people to spend time and effort and mental energy to get a thing (job) when you know you won’t give it to them, then you are wasting their time and effort and mental energy, which I can tell you as somebody who fucking hates looking for jobs, that mental energy can be in serious short supply for people looking for work.

            That “fresh pile of resumes” is definitely good for you when you want it, but the giant stale pile of resumes that you keep throwing away is not free for the people sending them in.

            • UmeU@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              The people that are emailing us their resume each month know that it might be 6 months or a year before we call them, we are super transparent about that.

              A lot of people want to work for us and we only have a limited number of positions which do not turn over very often.

              We generally only accept emailed resumes, not paper resumes.

    • UmeU@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Wasted whose time? It’s not like we are constantly interviewing people. When people put their resume in we tell them that when a spot opens up we will call them. We encourage them to put a resume in once a month so that when we need someone they will likely get a call. I don’t understand your term ‘hiring in advance’.

      How is accepting a resume when we aren’t actively hiring a scummy tactic? People ask to work here every day and we tell them that we aren’t actively hiring but we would be glad to accept a resume. The real persistent people who really want the job keep following back up and eventually they get hired and stay for years and years.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        How is accepting a resume when we aren’t actively hiring a scummy tactic?

        Saying that you’re hiring when you’re not hiring is the trick.