A bipartisan group of senators reached a deal Wednesday on legislation to ban stock trading by members of Congress, setting the bill up for action in the Senate later this month.

  • webhead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    AFTER BEING SIGNED INTO LAW seems like a huge loophole to me. They can just trade while they’re talking about it or right after it passes but hasn’t been signed, etc etc.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s how laws work. You can’t generally make something illegal retroactively, otherwise you could change the law to persecute anyone you want.

      How would you want them to approach it?

      • webhead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I dunno maybe they should be subject to more stringent rules like people at banks and such? If you can just trade your stocks right before you pass a law, what’s the point of the new rule? That’s part of why they’re under fire in the first place isn’t it? They have insider information. Saying you can’t trade after the fact seems like it’s too late to me. Maybe I didn’t explain that well idk.

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I understand your point, but that’s what this law would theoritcally accomplish. It would limit representatives/senators from being able to trade stocks (a higher standard than an average citizen). While they can buy/sell stocks before the law, that’s just the current state of affairs.

          Regarding the timing of trades, etc. The value of their insider knowledge is really only beneficial over long periods of time. Yes they could buy/sell stock in the interim, but preventing it long term would be an actual win.