• InternetUser2012@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Offer rides to those that can’t get to voting booths on their own. Keep spreading the word to vote. If everyone votes, there would be no republikkklowns in office and we can progress as a country instead of regress.

  • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    you know there was an amendment that was created for dealing with unelected tyrants. uhhhhh one? three? hmmm, I can’t seem to remember…

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    turning off voters is the biggest reason why we don’t vote imo in this environment and there’s nothing you can do about shitty choices that the democrats will give us; but there’s things you can do to overcome the other institutional part of it; aka gerrymandering:

    setup free voting ride shares with free filling snacks in gerrymandered states that will pick each person up from home; drop them off at their polling station; pick them up from there; and then drop them off at home w/o having to wait for everyone to finish voting. the lines are VERY long and take hours in heavily gerrymandered places like houston texas and people hate voting already; so making them wait or skip dinner to vote is a non-starter.

    setup free voting phone number and/or website that will help register you to vote (not just tell you what you need to do) on your behalf and include the option to mail you a pre-filled envelope and stamp if paper registration is required. advertise it HEAVILY on all forms of media everywhere and make it clear it’s not from the government.

    then, assign a case worker to every client to ensure that the registration was completed and followup on the problems that gerrymandered places usually create to suppress votes. also get lawyers or people familiar with election laws to file inquiries on each voter’s behalf each time a gerrymandered place manages to find a reason to disqualify a voter or an employer refuses to let them off to vote and use that case worker to manage it.

    expect it to fail the first few times because people hate talking about politics so they won’t listen for the first few cycles.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Fairly successful strategy I’ve been using lately is to out-crazy the red team and feed em their own medicine. No one here needs to be told the libertarian party is just Far Right Lite™, but do you know their selling points? Cuz there is no chance in HELL I’ll be able to convince a Trumpanzee to vote for Biden, but I have been able to steer a handful of votes away from Trump and toward Chase Oliver - usually goes down like this: MAGAt will open the conversation by bitching about someone on the blue team - such as Hillary and her emails. I’ll AGREE with them, but lump her and Trump into the same category… “Idk how they get away with sending classified data on a private email server or printing it out and hauling boxes of it to their private residence. If I did hundredth of the crime Trump or Hillary committed, I’d spend the rest of my life in jail!”. Bitch about how both parties are doing the bare minimum just to stay in power etc; then start pitching 3rd as an alternative option.

    ‘Both sides’ em, and change their vote to “not trump” by pitching whichever 3rd most closely aligns with their impressionability (which is pretty much always the LP). Put the spoiler effect to good use.

    And be weary of folks doing the same to you, especially here on Lemmy with all the ‘genocide Joe’ shit or encouraging apathy because of the shit debate.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      And be weary of folks doing the same to you, especially here on Lemmy with all the ‘genocide Joe’ shit or encouraging apathy because of the shit debate.

      I’m already quite weary of that!

      (“Weary” means tired; you probably meant “wary” which means cautious)

    • LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      And be weary of folks doing the same to you, especially here on Lemmy with all the ‘genocide Joe’ shit

      You’ve seen the broken, burnt, limbless and decapitated bodies of twenty-thousand plus dead children, live-tweeted into your living room for nine months and it isn’t enough for you to stop supporting the man principally responsible for it.

      You’re not “defeating fascism”, you are a fascist.

    • SUPAVILLAIN@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      What else do you call someone complicit in the genocide of a sovereign nation for the sole purpose of furthering a blatantly-supremacist regime? Other than Amerikan, I mean?

  • LordGimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Biden bombs wherever his campaign is located for suspected nuclear IEDs. In 25 years when congress is still investigating he’ll be dead too so the SC ruling that it wasn’t an “official act” will be moot as they can throw the bones in a jail cell for however long they want.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    I could make a few effective suggestions, but I don’t want to end up on a list. My life sucks enough without getting in trouble for a joke.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 days ago

        The American way. See a problem, wait until it’s too late to fix said problem, point fingers at a scapegoat for why the problem wasn’t solved earlier, and repeat.

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Convention hasn’t happened yet. It literally isn’t too late for that.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          The problem is that the act of swapping candidates will seem to be so entirely clueless that whoever steps up to the plate is bound to lose.

          Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. No one will spoil their chances for 2028 by being a late entry now. The democratic party is hunkering down for 4 more years of Trump is suspect.

          • sudo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            The only clean way to do it is for Biden to step down put Kamala in by default and let anyone who wants to run in 2028 fight for the new VP spot. Most voters thought this was the plan anyways in 2020. That said Biden’s not going to step down so they aren’t doing shit.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            They are not bound to lose.

            That is a statement that is being pushed, along with the whole Biden “Over prepared” thing as a talking point to push why we have to stick with a dementia-addled genocidal asshole.

            It’s simply not a true statement. You’re stating an opinion as fact, and it’s misleading as shit.

            The second someone else gets picked is the second that they (Whoever they are) have name recognition and people will consider that person.

            • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              I hope you’re right. I want you to be right. And I agree at this point the Democratic Party ought to try - damn, they’re losing anyway so they might as well try.

              My worry is that an alternative candidate that is worth their salt AND want to run against Trump can’t be found. I hope I’m wrong.

  • feoh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    Long shot here: Donate to charities which help people in need in predominantly Trump held districts.

    Less of a long shot: Volunteer for organizations like Vote Forward to try to reach folks. We’re all human beings at the end of the day, and appealing to people can’t hurt.

    • livingcoder@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I’m very curious how giving money to Trump supporters would hurt Trump? Some people are giving their last dollar to Trump and depend in charity at this point. Wouldn’t throwing money at local charities just further enable them?

  • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    They say your time is much better spent guaranteeing people who already will vote blue show up to polls than trying to change the opinion of people who will vote red.

    So that looks like asking people “do you have a plan to vote?” And perhaps in a less nosy phrasing: “When will you vote?” “How will you get there?”

    People verbalizing a plan makes them more likely to follow through.

    There are many places you can sign up to go canvassing, which is great. I would suggest in addition to and maybe before that, make a list of everyone you know and would feel comfortable talking to, and talk to them about voting. You will get much more mileage from existing relationships. (It’s like how sales differentiates a warm lead and a cold lead)

    Once you’ve exhausted that list then every little bit still helps. I do think high density events like farmers markets, community gatherings, concerts, games, etc have better rate of contact than door to door.

    • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I realize I just essentially said to tell people to vote while you were asking for something more. I wanted to share that because some people think that posting “vote” is the same as having a conversation about voting. Posting is not nearly as effective.

      Another thing that might help is directly asking elected officials to intervene. Staffers for politicians keep a tally of calls and letters they receive for/against a given issue. So while your words may not move an elected, you and some friends can get them to act on an issue. If you have a group you can also request a meeting to discuss your issue which is even more effective. Politicians take notice of organized groups of constituents since that’s a block of votes for/against them and possible a group knocking doors for/against them.

      The trouble is I don’t know what the ask is. There should be a specific action you’re demanding: “introduce this bill” “cosponsor this bill” “vote for/against this bill”. And it has to be something they’re able to do. I don’t know what that thing would be.

      Pack the supreme court (but there’s not time for that or majority in the house).

      Long term I think building true power means growing communities, joining unions and cooperatives. Most of us aren’t rich or powerful enough to be heard, which is why organizing is so important. None of this is fair or easy to do.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    The vast majority of Americans both already know how they feel about Trump and Biden and live in a solidly red or blue state. If you do want to focus on Biden, volunteer with phone banking or canvassing so that your efforts are directed to where they’ll actually matter and be organized in line with their messaging. Personally, I’d say you’re better off focusing on local races where you have more of an opportunity to come at it from a different angle and cut through people’s fortified positions. And as another user said, focus on mobilization, it’s easier to get someone who already agrees with you to register and make a plan than to convince someone to change their whole worldview.

    There are also strategies outside of electoralism, such as protests and counter-protests. You can join an organization and form tactics and strategies to subvert the right’s actions, and engage with direct action to build trust and community that could be important in the future. Form strategies while being realistic about your goals and capabilities and coordinate with others.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Who’s really going to be swayed by a phone bank? My democratic rep keeps robocalling me and sending text messages and I honestly find it more annoying than anything. This does not work in 2024.

      If someone canvassing (or a potential solicitor) knocks on my door I’m either not going to answer it or ask them to leave because I’m busy and don’t want my time taken up.

      These are totally ineffective strategies IMO.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        There are a few types of people that get targeted based on a voter profile, if my tiny amount of phone banking experience matches. There are the people who are probably going to vote for your party, but need a reminder because they are disengaged. Then there are swing voters that actually are on the fence and use a little information about your candidate. Like, most people don’t know much about Biden’s infrastructure package, so list off some projects nearby.

  • htrayl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Money. Donate. There isn’t a near term world where money won’t matter in giving you a voice, so you should use it.

  • toastboy79@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Become one of Biden’s close personal advisors and remind him of his obligation to protect the constitution from insurrectionists using official acts? Sorry I’m hella salty today.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      He can’t. His only power over SCOTUS is nominating Justices in the event of a vacancy.

      Congress can, but Republicans control the House.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          That only applies to criminal prosecution. You really think Biden is going to off a dozen or so House members?

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            No, because he’s a coward and an appeaser.

            Btw, your cope that it has to be the President specifically doing the acts is disagreed with by Sonya Sotomayor in her dissent where she states outright that this decision makes political assassination legal.

            But you’d know the implications better than a SC Justice who works with the fascist members of the Court, right?

            • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              So Biden can officially assassinate the entire Republican side and the supreme Court and because he was president when he ordered it, it is legal?

              • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 days ago

                Yes, exactly. “They were insurrectionists bent on overthrowing our government, and it was a tough, but necessary, decision to protect the nation, which is my duty as President.”

                That claim isn’t even entirely untrue.

                • Asafum@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  But Biden himself came out and spoke about the ruling (paraphrasing) “we need presidents to use their power with caution and respect the (self imposed) limitations of it. I’ll continue to do just that. The next guy might not do so and that’s concerning.”

                  Just a big ol’ shrug from Biden… “I won’t do it, but he sure as hell will.”

                  Thanks Mr.Virtue… where is all that virtue when it comes to Palestinians?

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              No. It’s new, and I haven’t seen the full transcript. I’m repeating what I’ve read in the news. Do you have a link so I can learn more?

              I understand how the President could theoretically order an assassination then pardon. That was a good point I read in another thread.

                • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  You’re absolutely correct. This is the part that has been left out of every news article I’ve read, and is undoubtedly the most concerning:

                  And some Presidential conduct-for example, speaking to and on behalf of the American people, see Trump v. Hawaii, 585 U. S. 667, 701 (2018) - certainly can qualify as official even when not obviously connected to a particular constitutional or statutory provision. For those reasons, the immunity we have recognized extends to the “outer perimeter” of the President’s official responsibilities, covering actions so long as they are “not manifestly or palpably beyond [his] authority.”

                  So it’s not just acts committed by the President, but also ordered by the President.

                  It’s also vague enough that charges can get bounced around lower courts indefinitely.

                  Thank you again for the link. I didn’t see it when I first searched.

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        He can’t. His only power over SCOTUS is nominating Justices in the event of a vacancy.

        This is wrong. He can pack the courts RIGHT NOW. The Democratic party still holds the Senate. There is no requirement for there to only be nine justices.

        Edit: This does require the house changing the number of justices. So the above is incorrect.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      If Biden did that the House might impeach him. I mean, the surviving members of the House probably wouldn’t, but they theoretically could.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    All practical options are extralegal.

    I know I’ve been asking myself if I want to stick around to see what happens, but I dunno if I have the courage to turn the gun on myself. I’d drink myself to death, if I had any booze around.