• frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    . . . anything and everything to do with space.

    No. Just no. Soviets had their successes, but they were bad at building fundamental tech. Their space program was callous towards both human and animal life. They were focused on being the first at everything, and tended to run with the solution they could implement immediately. It wasn’t built in a way where successes could be leveraged for more successes. Nor did it build fundamental tech in ways that could be used in the economy at large.

    Ironically, capitalism was able use space technology to improve the lives of the working class better than a supposedly communist system did.

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      but they were bad at building fundamental tech.

      Yeah, they were so bad at it that they ended up in space first. Just absolutely terrible.

      Their space program was callous towards both human and animal life.

      Show us your proof, PragerU fan.

      It wasn’t built in a way where successes could be leveraged for more successes.

      So the Soviet Union launching Sputnik had absolutely nothing to do with them successfully landing Venera 7 on the surface of Venus?

      Absolutely nothing at all, eh?

      Strange how your right-wing friends at the RAND corporation didn’t share your Ben Shapiro-level shittakes about the Soviet space program.

      capitalism was able use space technology to improve the lives of the working class capitalist parasites better than a supposedly communist system did.

      FTFY.

      Also, learn what the word “irony” means.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, they were so bad at it that they ended up in space first. Just absolutely terrible.

        And rushed it so bad they didn’t have fundamental tech that was applicable to a wider economy.

        Their space program was callous towards both human and animal life.

        Show us your proof, PragerU fan.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laika#Ethics_of_animal_testing

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nedelin_catastrophe

        https://www.npr.org/sections/krulwich/2011/05/02/134597833/cosmonaut-crashed-into-earth-crying-in-rage

        The Soviet rocket program failed a lot, but they covered it up at the time. It’s largely come out in the time since then, and it was horrific. If NASA lost an astronaut, everything shuts down and they figure out what happens. When a test site in Russia blowed up and kills over 50 people, including the head of the development program, that’s just Tuesday.

        capitalism was able use space technology to improve the lives of the working class capitalist parasites better than a supposedly communist system did.

        FTFY.

        Nah, I like my version better. The proof is the machine you’re using to type this.

        Also, I’m a socialist. I just don’t think the USSR was very good system. There’s both positive and negative things to learn from it, but the most important is “let’s not do that again”.