• idiomaddict@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    No, it’s the word choice in the sentence as a whole. “Baseless claims” and “categorically denied” make it seem like the article was nonsense. “Controversy” acknowledges that there are different accounts of what happened, but doesn’t pick a side and “denied” feels like the most neutral choice to me, but I’m a layperson and there are entire classes in journalism programs dedicated to neutral phrasing. Calling the article “insightful journalism” is obviously biased and saying “continues to deny” sounds even more supportive of the journalist’s claims, because it implies that people are continuously asking Israel about it, which further implies that multiple people are unsatisfied with Israel’s account of the events.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t mean this in any sort of insulting way, but I think you’ve put far more analysis into this than the person who was writing on a deadline did into writing it.

      Did the author have a bias? Quite possibly. But I think your implication that these were conscious choices is going a bit too far.

      • idiomaddict@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I have no idea if they decided to write the article in a biased way, but I don’t know if that matters. The people reading it still associate the article with “baseless claims,” which colors their view.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Fair enough. I guess up to now, it seemed to me like people were implying that this was a conscious bias.