• kite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just one of those fires is 600 square miles in size. I can’t even begin to comprehend what that must be like, and I’ve been in a wildfire situation before

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      To me that’s the standout statistic here. I’m a little less sympathetic to “entire cities” with less population than anything I’m familiar with but holy crap …. My small suburb has way over the population of the entire territory but the size of that fire is 46 times the area! Damn

      Actually, I live near Boston and that fire is over 6 times the area of the city.

      Looking farther afield, that fire is twice the area of New York City

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    About 20,000 residents in Yellowknife are being urged to get out of the way of fast-moving flames as more than 230 fires char the territory and smoke creeps south, impacting air quality in the United States.

    One of the wildfires burning west of Yellowknife is approximately 165,000 hectares, more than 600 square miles, and inching closer to the community and main highway, according to Mike Gibbins, who manages communications for Municipal Affairs Minister Shane Thompson’s office.

    Thompson declared an emergency for the entire territory on Tuesday, which will allow officials “to access and deploy resources so that we can continue our work to protect residents and communities in a more efficient manner,” he said.

    Sensitive groups, such as people with lung or heart disease, the elderly and children are urged to avoid prolonged or heavy exertion and the general public is being told to limit outdoor activity.

    In Canada, the Minister of National Defense Bill Blair on Tuesday mobilized the Canadian Armed Forces to provide firefighting personnel, airlift resources, and logistical support to the Northwest Territories.

    “We stand with the people of the Northwest Territories as they experience their worst fire season on record, and I am confident that our military personnel will do their utmost to assist their fellow Canadians,” Blair said in a statement.


    I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Striker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one will do anything until we start hunting them. Entire cites are burning down. Peace is not an option.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, it is probably too late for a revolution to be meaningful. Climate collapse will take decades to resolve itself even if we halted all carbon usage today.

      Leaving the planet might actually be a more realistic option, especially to preserve what’s left of nature.

      I’m not saying don’t eat the rich though. Just that it won’t stop what’s already started.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think this is a bigger climate change issue than vast areas of dry brush or woods mire likely to burn ….

    – Forest fires are not new to the area but the increased risk and size are

    – who the f expects wildfires in Hawaii? How does it get dry enough for that to happen?

    – meanwhile I’m sitting here in the Northeast US with so much rain that even with way above average temperatures, my grass is still green and growing like Spring. Usually it goes dormant sometime in July and you don’t have to cut it much anymore (unless you water it) but I’m still more than once per week

    • Spzi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      the fires were started due to climate change?

      Interesting academic question. Let’s assume, for the sake of the argument, that these specific fires were not.

      It’s still an uncontroversial insight that events like these will occur more often, and become more severe, as a consequence of climate change.

      So even if this particular event was not caused by climate change (or if a causal link cannot be shown beyond doubt), it still serves as a taste for things to come.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildfire#Climate_change_effects