MoreCoffee@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前DuckDuckGo AI Chatduckduckgo.comexternal-linkmessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up1156arrow-down112file-textcross-posted to: asklemmy@lemmy.mlbecomeme@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1144arrow-down1external-linkDuckDuckGo AI Chatduckduckgo.comMoreCoffee@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前message-square61fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: asklemmy@lemmy.mlbecomeme@sh.itjust.works
minus-squarewewbull@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·5 个月前Yes. They should pass on all the things you’ve doing to the data harvesting overlords. Why the hell wouldn’t they?
minus-squareShadowCat@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·5 个月前but they claim to not to save the chat and that it won’t be used for training
minus-squareBetaDoggo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·5 个月前The issue is that they have no way of verifying that. We’d have to trust 2 other companies in addition to DDG.
minus-squareShadowCat@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 个月前they could’ve made it optional, then if someone wanted to, they could opt in. there are also open source models like llama and mistral which they can run on their own hardware. but that would probably be too expensive for DDG
Yes. They should pass on all the things you’ve doing to the data harvesting overlords. Why the hell wouldn’t they?
but they claim to not to save the chat and that it won’t be used for training
The issue is that they have no way of verifying that. We’d have to trust 2 other companies in addition to DDG.
they could’ve made it optional, then if someone wanted to, they could opt in. there are also open source models like llama and mistral which they can run on their own hardware. but that would probably be too expensive for DDG