• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Do you consider the President responsible for the outcomes of their tenure or not?

    When congress and the judiciary is working against them? Not.

    Are you going to blame Biden for the conservative majority on the Supreme court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson as well?

    You seem insistent in an interpretation that doesn’t leave Biden culpable for the outcomes of his time as President. But that’s not how leadership works. The buck stops with you when you are in the big seat.

    So the separation of powers as outlined in the Constitution is not a thing and Biden has the unilateral power to do whatever he likes. Gotcha.

    • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Are you going to blame Biden for the conservative majority on the Supreme court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson as well?

      Do me a favor and google “Anita Hill”. Then google what the chair of the senate judiciary does

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        So Biden confirmed Clarence Thomas because he knew that decades later, he would be president and the president before him would confirm three ultra-conservative justices so that he could avoid culpability when they overthrew Roe v. Wade? Is that what you’re claiming?

        • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Im claiming that Biden spent decades in the senate enabling the radical right’s rise to power. Some of that was from incompetence, some was from anti-Black and anti-arab racism. Some of it was because the neoliberal policies he supports aren’t that different from what ‘fiscal conservatives’ want.

          Biden has had a hand in most of the disastrous policies of the last 30 years - from putting sexist pieces of shit in SCOTUS and drastically expanding the prison population, to invading Iraq and drastically expanding the surveillance state.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Weird that you’re blaming Biden for the overturning of Roe v. Wade and not the presidents who appointed the justices who overturned it…

            • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Of course Reagan and the Bushes deserve a lot the blame. But none of them are currently president, and Biden built his career on bipartisanship - even more than his democratic peers. He was there at every step that set the stage for Trump’s appointments that were the final nails in the coffin

              I’ve never been supportive of, you know, "it’s my body, I can do what I want with it.

              • Biden in the year 2024
              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                And now I know you’re dishonest by taking that quote out of context:

                I asked Biden what he would do in a second term to protect abortion access at the federal level. “Pass Roe v. Wade as the law of the land,” he said. Democrats would need to win control of the House of Representatives and gain seats in the Senate, but Biden expressed confidence. “A few more elections like we’ve seen taking place in the states” would suffice, he said. “You’re seeing the country changing.” Then, reiterating his position on Roe, he said, “I’ve never been supportive of, you know, ‘It’s my body, I can do what I want with it.’ But I have been supportive of the notion that this is probably the most rational allocation of responsibility that all the major religions have signed on and debated over the last thousand years.”

                https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/03/11/joe-biden-profile

                A simple Google search showed me the context. If you’re going to be dishonest, do it better.

                • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  The context does not make it any better. He is stating his sincerely held belief as a conservative Catholic. He is stating his belief that had guided his policymaking for decades. It’s why he was blindsided by the Dobbs decision. Yes, he supports access to abortion, but as the quote shows, it’s always been more about realpolitik than a sincere belief in the right to abortion

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Sure, it doesn’t make it any better… if you ignore the “Pass Roe v. Wade as the law of the land" part. He’s saying that abortion should be legal even if he personally isn’t in favor of it.

                    Why does he personally have to be in favor of it? Why do his personal feelings matter more than what he thinks should be legal?

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      All that’s clear from your response is that you don’t appreciate the role of leadership and how it works.

      Leadership doesn’t get to pass on responsibility. It doesn’t matter if its a conservative SC or you don’t have congress in your favor. The deck being stacked against you doesn’t mean you get a pass. What it means is you have to come up with a different way of getting the job done. You have to be clever and strategic and get around obstacles. Every leader has to deal with these things, the job of leadership is to figure out ways to overcome these things. A leader who passes the buck on the responsibility for the outcomes of their tenure is no leader at all. By deferring responsibility, you are making the point that Biden is a weak leader incapable of overcoming adversity. If that’s the case, why should any one vote for them?

      You should meditate on that phrase and look at it in historical context. Your desire that Biden not be considered responsible for his tenure is just… its not how the world works. Defending Biden’s weakness isn’t having the effect you think it should, rather, it highlights how ineffectual he’s been as President and that he may not really be qualified for the role.

      An edit because I did want to respond to this:

      Are you going to blame Biden for the conservative majority on the Supreme court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson as well?

      Yes absolutely. We should blame Biden, and the Democrats writ large for both the conservative Supreme court and the fact that Dobbs v. Jackson was even allowed to be on the table. I don’t know if you remember, but Biden was vice president in recent history. That’s an incredibly powerful position. He was also a Senator, and the Democrats held a majority in congress for enough time to get a national right to an abortion into congress, but they decided it wasn’t a priority. Democrats are as to blame for the erosion of abortion rights in this country as the conservatives advocating for a christian theocracy. These guys aren’t marvel heroes or sports stars. You don’t need to cheer them on, you need to hold them responsible. They’re employees who’ve failed to take their jobs seriously and get the priorities of their voters into law. If anything, Democrats are more responsible for the current state of abortion rights in this country because they chose to not make them a priority.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        and the Democrats held a majority in congress for enough time to get a national right to an abortion into congress,

        At what point did pro-choice Democrats hold that majority?

        At what point could any of the previous Democratic presidents in the last 30 years have gotten a Supreme Court majority?

        You should meditate on that phrase and look at it in historical context.

        I gave you the context. The context was that it was said by a president who committed genocide and sat on his ass when it came to most civil rights issues.

        Weird that I brought those two things up and you don’t seem to believe the buck stopped with him on them.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think you are being intentionally obtuse. Like it or not, Biden is going to be held accountable for the outcomes of his time in office. You don’t seem to think they should be held accountable to that standard, but your opinion on this is basically irrelevant, because they will be. Its why they are losing this election and defending them in the way that you are is setting them up for failure. You seem to view the Democrats as victims of circumstance, but that if that’s the case, then why should any one vote for them?

          When you are a leader the buck stops with you. The phrase is over 200 years old and has been used in many contexts to describe the finality of responsibility, and how it inevitably lands on the shoulders of a figurehead like a President. You obviously have no appreciation for its significance or how leadership is ultimately responsible for the outcomes of their tenure. Your defense of the indefensible highlights how weak Joe Biden has been as a leader and ultimately weakens any argument for why he should be President again. Blaming Republicans or the SC or anything but Joe Biden for the outcomes of Joe Biden’s presidency is passing the on responsibility of leadership, and in spite of your desire that it be some other way, it just isn’t so.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            What he will be held accountable for and what he is able to achieve are two different things.

            And I notice you didn’t answer my question of when the Democrats had a pro-choice majority.

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              What he will be held accountable for and what he is able to achieve are two different things.

              Hes not going to be President is whats going to happen.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Okay, that still doesn’t change the fact that he can’t achieve what he can’t achieve. He isn’t a dictator and he doesn’t have magic powers. If that will cost him the election, that really can’t be helped. You might as well blame his inability to time travel.

                Why are you evading my question?

                • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You are obtuse and not worth the time of answering. You fail to understand real politic and misunderstand the functional role of a president. You live in a fantasy of how you wish things were instead of how they are. I’m ignoring the attempts you make to sideline the primary thrust of this conversation, which is : Is the President responsible for the outcomes of their tenure? I’m not interested in some non-sequitur sidebar conversation you seem interested in having, because you are barely worth my time as it is. We’re going to stay focused.

                  Biden is responsible for his failures and he’ll be held accountable for them. Pretending that the buck doesn’t stop with the president doesn’t change the fact that ultimately, a president is responsible for the outcomes of government during their tenure. That’s how the world works, in-spite of your desire to live in a fantasy that is otherwise. Because of this, defending Biden’s poor record on outcomes becomes an unconvincing argument on why to support him, and highlights his weakness, broadly, as a leader. Engaging in apologetics does more to damage Biden’s chances than it does to support them. We need Biden to win or we’re beyond fucked, but he has to actually do better. It can’t be in the form of soundbytes or apologetics from the media or his online sycophants.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Is the President responsible for the outcomes of their tenure?

                    Again, not always.

                    I have answered your question twice. I have asked you twice to answer mine. Will you?

      • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        People want the government to operate without opposition. Almost like in a… one-party state?