• takeda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 months ago

    The LLM isn’t really thinking, it is auto complete trained so the average person would be fooled thinking that text was produced by another human.

    I’m not surprised it has flaws like that.

    BTW here on Lenny there are communities with AI pictures. Someone created a similar community but with art created by humans.

    While the AI results are very good, when you start looking and comparing it with non AI art, you start seeing that the AI while it is unique it still produces a cookie cutter results.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yep, AI art is just getting through its irrational exuberance phase. It was (and sometimes is) impressive to create art in a style most of us can’t draw or paint in. But AI models tend to produce very similar results unless very specifically prompted. AI art creators are also using a lot of other tools (like ControlNet, which allows you to replicate composition elements from another work) to break out of the “default AI model” look.

      All of that points to an immediate future where AI art is seen as low-quality and instantly identifiable, except where AI art creators have spent a fair amount of time customizing and tailoring their image. Kind of like…real artists using pre-AI modern tools like Photoshop, filters, etc.