• samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I looked it up and today is the 2 year anniversary of The Slap. Doesn’t seem like it’s been that long.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    His star has really crashed and burned, hasn’t it? He tried to put his kids in movies and they can’t act and are also very weird, so no one went to see them. His wife cheated on him and laughed about it. On national TV. He slapped Chris Rock at the Oscars because he told a mean, but not horribly offensive joke. No wonder no one wants to give to their charity.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      To be fair, it sounds like it might have been a consensual open marriage.

      Speaking of his children, does anybody remember Jaden Smith on Twitter posting super cringe shit? That was probably like a decade ago now

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Judging by Jada’s book and Will’s reactions on interviews, someone definitely forgot to tell him about the open marriage arrangement. Dude found out about it on live TV.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Which is weird because I thought that’s how rich people used foundations named after themselves? I thought it was mostly self-funded and a way to lower their tax burden

      • Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Foundations aren’t deductible though. You have to give it away to an honest-to-God charity approved by the IRS for it to do anything. And even then, you can never get more money by donating it than you would just keeping the money.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You lower your tax burden by as much as the taxes you would have otherwise paid on the money you gave to charity.

        If you give 100$ that would have been taxed at 30%, you get a 30$ tax deduction, you’re still down 70$.

        • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, but if you control said foundation, you can then have it spent on things that you care about. It isn’t the get out of tax free card that some people make it out to be, but it can probably be beneficial in some situations.

          Is what I, someone who hasn’t got the slightest clue about U.S. law, thinks.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Sure, but in theory the charity can be audited and it shouldn’t be buying you stuff you would have spent that money on otherwise… Like, you can’t give money to a charity and have it buy you a yacht.

            • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              You can pay yourself as admin of said charity. Give me $100, I pay $20 tax or stick it in charity to reduce my tax burden. I have $80. I get 100 other people to give my charity $100 each, it has $10k, I take 50% for admin costs, the rest is disbursed. I still make more money than lost to any tax. That’s how a rich person makes money by running a charity. Make even more family money by putting your kids on the BoD.

            • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Technically you can as long as the yacht is used exclusively for the charity. This was the case when the rightwing tried to say a BLM charity foundation misused funds to buy a mansion, but it turns out the mansion stayed in the hands of the charity even after those administrators left the foundation. AFAIK the mansion was only ever used for meetings, fundraisers, and celebrations.

            • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              I mean, sure. I was more thinking about “I care about deforestation/child poverty/outlawing abortion/etc, so I’m gonna make sure my money goes there, and I won’t even have to pay taxes on (that part of) it”, with maybe a bit of “I own (many shares of) a company that does X, so why not suggest that the foundation prefers them as a supplier”.

              Like, that doesn’t allow you to buy yachts with it, but if you’re working with that kind of money, you probably have a yacht, or don’t want one/another, and exerting influence is the most interesting thing you can use it for. The particular objective doesn’t have to be harmful, but I feel that it gives very few people another way to excert outsized control on our world, and take revenue away from the state, which might also waste it, but over which the people should, theoretically, be able to excert more influence than on a very wealthy individual.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                But that’s a tax advantage anyone can have access to by giving money to the charity of their choice.

                • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  The tax advantage, yes, the control, no. I like giving to doctors without borders, but I can’t control their objectives, nor their leadership.

                  In the end, my problem is with giving power to individuals who can’t be held accountable. The tax part was mostly an excuse to rant about that.

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    If Will left Jada, and went full scorched earth on her and the scientologists (e.g. Leah Remini), We’d all love him again.

          • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            So when he made a comment about how Stephen must have been beaten up at some point? I mean. That’s reaching. it was awkward, but imo really doesn’t rise to “basically physically threatened.” Especially since Colbert has had him on his shows repeatedly afterwards, you’d think that if Stephen didn’t feel safe around him, probly wouldn’t have him back on.

            On another note, god I miss the Colbert Report. That was peak satire.

            • tacosplease@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              That’s how veiled threats work. There was nothing wrong with Colbert’s face. Smith brought up someone kicking his ass out of nowhere. Colbert understood and even said something like “I hope nobody kicks my ass this interview”. Smith later states how he’s handsome and strong. Etc.

              • Traegert@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Do you not understand how banter works? Have you never had a conversation with friends before? I mean the guy is a douche but you don’t need to just make wild shit up, there’s plenty of ACTUAL things he’s done to not like him before you start lying

                • tacosplease@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Perhaps you just didn’t pick up on the threat, but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. It was obvious enough for me to notice it and remember it 16 years later.

                  You think I just kept that interview in my pocket that long waiting for the right opportunity to… lie about Will Smith? And that seems to make you angry?

                  This is Jaden isn’t it? I just found Jaden Smith on Lemmy.

  • Melkath@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Shitty movie bitch and maniacal evil groomer villain, aka Scientology Abridged still exist?

    • qisope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s the post-slap life for us

      It’s the post-slap life for us

      'Stead of treated

      We get tricked

      'Stead of kisses

      We get kicked

      It’s the post-slap life