• lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 days ago

    HUMANS are accountable for 100% of this.

    Start slapping cuffs and it stops. They want regulation - regulate them into 6’ cells

    • Eril@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have been very confused so far this year, that every other week we hear about some company/country being attacked by an AI, but then everyone going “oh well, nothing anyone can do anything about. What a pity”.

    • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is 100% the case. If an engineering firm fucks up and a bridge of building collapses or a CPU lacks working floating point arithmetic, they’re going to pay out the nose for it.

      They’re running around pretending they can’t control any of this, but without giving a language model access to a shell or something, what the fuck can it do?

      We have to deliberately grant these abilities. Otherwise, they don’t exist.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s not quite true. As with the huggingface attack, the ability can be negligently granted as well.

  • metermatic26@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Seems a little too convenient that a company, which desperately relies on data to train its models, has an oopsy involving its agents hacking numerous databases and stealing data.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    OpenAI staff have been attacking public databases with various internal tools. Charges have yet been laid.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Do the computer intrusion and hacking laws require intent? If not, these should be open and shut cases of criminal acts stemming from negligence.

    “But nobody was harmed and nobody profited!”

    Degrading access to databases harms the authorized users. The AI firms are profiting from this daya theft.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    that is why they found reddit to be less useful, which was typified by the drop in traffic. so they are going after other online sources. probably after free peer-review research paper(although they have been using cloudflare)

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Smoke em while you got em. They gotta secure their competitive edge before legislation catches up.