The Ukrainian government had informed the White House about Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s decision to dismiss Valerii Zaluzhnyi, Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the Washington Post reported on 2 February with reference to two sources.

Source: European Pravda with reference to The Washington Post

Details: WP stated that the White House officials had not supported this decision but did not object either, recognizing this step as “the president’s sovereign choice”.

Quote: “The early warning also provided the White House an opportunity to urge Zelensky to reconsider the pivotal decision — even though it decided against doing so.”

The Washington Post adds with reference to people familiar with Zelenskyy’s thinking that he may postpone the decision about the dismissal of Zaluzhnyi indefinitely, though “that appeared unlikely”.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m sure there are reasons behind this, but it definitely seems questionable from a morale and PR perspective since I’m pretty sure Zaluzhnyi is super popular (unless that was the problem…? Which I doubt tbh).

    • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you believe Ryan Evans from War on the Rocks quoting confidential sources, a rivalry has developed between Zelensky and Zaluzhny. Apparently, Zelensky fears that Zaluzhniy may challenge him for the presidency. Also, military analysts think that some of Ukraine’s poor military decisions have come from Zelensky, not Zaluzhny, which is bound to create some tension.

      Starts at about 17:45: https://open.spotify.com/episode/12e2WYSgm9smWYgSZN1UwT?si=0YBQ32UgS6W2776dXggN9Q

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        An overly popular general who takes all the credit for victory and blames all the losses on those pesky politicians, you say?

        Can’t imagine why he’d get the boot from a military still struggling with corruption.

        Conjecture aside, does Commander in Chief mean the same thing to the Ukrainian military that it means to the American?

        Seems like a bad idea to not have your chief executive be able to give direct orders, but maybe I’m just not understanding their idea of the chain of command.

        • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It could be the overly popular and ambitious general scenario, or it could be the scenario of the meddling politician who is incompetent in military matters causing major losses of men and materiel. History has examples of both.

          Unfortunately, the lack of progress in the war naturally leads to internal frustration and conflict. The West could certainly help if we would stop using Ukraine military aid as a political football.

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      This has been brewing since late last year. It seems like Zelensky feels like Zaluzhnyi has been interfering in the political side of the war, and Zaluszhnyi feels like he’s just been representing the situation as the military sees it.

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah this seems odd, he was a rockstar last year. Maybe the current stalemate is the cause.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s a political office, so, yeah?

      The question of whether it’s justified will never be apparent to people outside the inner circles, if even then.

    • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Probably bad. There’s no reports I’ve heard the guy isn’t good at his job. It seems to be a political decision, maybe partly motivated by unrealistic ideas Zelensky has about where the conflict is now, which he’s publicly contradicted.