• Electricblush@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    The thing is its only the copyrights of individual artists and creators that will die to this.

    The big corpos will find a way to protect their value, just you wait.

    They will steal from every single creative in the world and then sue them to hell and back if they use anything they them selves “own”

    This is not a threat to the copyrights that you want to die.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I can’t help but agree.

      I hate things like patenting game mechanics and the RIAA throwing people in prison over mp3s, and everything Disney does.

      But as an artist I’d also feel kinda, no, REALLY, shitty, if the second I put my human soul into something that got any kind of attention, it was (now legally) ripped off and everyone but me would make bank off of it.

      Tshirts, plushies, videogames, a major corpo making a bugillion dollar movie. . .and very quickly nobody would even know I did it. But we still have bills to pay and all the rip-off sandfleas dropshipping my intellectual labor would say “Get a real job then lmao.”

      How many games has Facebook or Zynga ripped off of small time creators and shoved them into obscurity just because they have the money and visibility?

      Imagine how much it sucks to hear people describe your 5 year old work as “Oh that’s like a clone of that 2 month old Facebook game.”

      Talk about punishing creativity. Everything would be like it is with AAA games and Hollywood now but worse: Trapped in a time-bubble of rip off fanfic of whatever hyper-consumer “fandom” that generation grew up with.

      I think the people sincerely pushing this “eliminate copyright entirely” idea are the same “idea guys” that think prompting a robot will allow them to finally “tell their story” with the most minimal of efforts.

      They’re fine with intellectual theft because the burden of forming one’s own personality not defined by consumption has already proven too great to bear.

      …and their masterpiece will belong on the infinite trash heap of everyone else’s story that did the same thing…

      TL;DR: Keep copyright. Fix public domain laws. Tighten the leash on corpos.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      You are a fool if you think copyrights can protect anyone but the big corporations.

      Copyright are a cancer for mankind, they should disappear.

      • Electricblush@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Well they do… But only barely and less so in the US lately.

        There are still cases of small artists getting compensation for big business using their images or music without consent. But sadly it is far from the norm.

        I agree with your core sentiment. Copyright is not working how it was intended and it is being abused by corporations.

        It might be because I’m not American, or because I am a musician and songwriter myself. but I still see a point to having some laws protecting the rights of the creative mind behind something.

        Removing copyright completely will only make it even more easy for the guys with the money and resources to exploit the small independent creators.

        But (American) copyright is severely broken. This is true.

        A starting point would be that the right is only tied to the specific creative(s) actually involved in the creation of something.

        • bouh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          While I understand where you’re coming from and the hope you may have in copyright, we don’t agree. I firmly believe copyrights are a cancer, an aberration that can only worsen things, especially in the age of Internet.

          The paternity right (that’s how what’s you referring to in your last sentence is called in France) may not be completely harmful, but history proves it’s useless imo.