The Apple Vision Pro is supposed to be the start of a new spatial computing revolution. After several days of testing, it’s clear that it’s the best headset ever made — which is the problem.

  • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The review was great, and the fact that Apple went it’s way to try and do something to be seen as an innovator is awesome, for one reason only: they failed horribly.

    Granted, this is the best VR handset that could be done with today’s tech, and even then it’s bad. There’s no use outside niche applications, and too much constraints and trade offs for it to be reliable. We need a huge advance in tech for AR be feasible and socially acceptable.

    And you can’t even play proper games with this thing.

    • ExLisper@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s not even that it’s not feasible. The entire idea is stupid. VR makes a lot of sense in entertainment and AR will one day be really great for small things like showing map directions and notifications but the concept of a virtual computer controlled by waving your hands around is just silly. It will never make sense.

      • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The main use case I think right now, really is the expanded monitors view. For people that travel a lot it might be a real use case

        • ExLisper@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          9 months ago

          To carry the whole VisionPro bag, keyboard and mouse instead of simply taking your laptop? The review makes it clear it’s not usable without peripherals, you will still need some desk. It’s solving a problem that doesn’t exist.

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I work on 3 monitors during the day, with multiple virtual desktops. It solves for that, and that alone. That being said, I wouldn’t pay $3500 for the privilege, especially when it ONLY operates in the Apple ecosystem, which I don’t care for. Other VR desktops exist, but they’re all kinda “meh”. I’ll invest when a device can be used neutrally as just a VR monitor tool.

            • nymwit@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              The stuff I’ve seen is saying it can only do one extra display from a mac. Is there another way? The high resolution capabilities also suggest one full quality display would max out wireless bandwidth.

              • just_another_person@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                Spatial window arrangements essentially makes an entire 360 space of a room the monitor. You don’t need many views at that point.

                • nymwit@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  So you’re talking about placing app windows everywhere? Then you’re limited to placing apple’s available apps for the device everywhere around you aren’t you? Which doesn’t sound like what you want. I’m taking your 3 monitors comment to mean you’re not running 3 monitors worth of mobile apps (because that would be wild if you were!). The 360 degree desktop setup here is going to be more like 360 degrees of ipad apps seems like. Maybe a windows remote desktop sort of app with multiple instances/windows all around you? Multiple safari instances all connected to some sort of web based remote desktop? I too want “spatial computing” to be more platform agnostic and want to be able to just paste applications or desktops on blank walls or floating in space.

                  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Yeah, that’s sort of its purpose. Take away all the dumb Apple notifications and useless info about the world it can detect, because (surprise) it’s not portable, and it’s a $3500 virtual desktop you don’t need navigate with a mouse. It’s useful in some cases, sure, but not a general consumer device at this price point or particular case of use. The bull of purchases were probably made by large scale content creation firms to do things like video editing. Sadly, Microsoft’s AR glasses were somehow just a stupid, but more useful than Apple’s.

        • Bloodyhog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          What kind of people that travel a lot you think may benefit? Genuinely curious. All the guys who do travel can mostly do everything with their phone because they have other guys working for them in the office doing the actual multiple screens stuff. Or maybe these are the only ones I saw in my life on the road )

          • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Software engineers that work remotely? My uncle has to spend at least 8 hours travelling a month often by plane to attend meetings he still has to do despite being most of the time at home

            • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’m a systems engineer who spends most of my time coding, and I have a quest 2. Unless apple has somehow fixed the big issue of VR headsets having no peripheral vision (you have to move your head to see things not in the cone in front of you, can’t just shift your eyes) and relatively shit resolution, using a VR headset as a large screen/screens for text content would still be headache inducing.

              The amount you’d have to zoom the text in order to be readable for long periods of time would make it unreasonable to try and code in.

              I would love for VR to actually work as the movie idea of an infinite desktop, but in my experience it really falls short in that use case. I’ll admit, a quest 2 is a real budget headset, so maybe higher end ones work better for it, but the one high end headset I’ve used had the same limitations.

            • Bloodyhog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Hm, not sure if I can agree here. There may be a handful of people like that - but that is not the market worth developing as far as I can see. You would normally either travel, or spend your time in front of 3 screens full of text. Also, having anything on your head for a long time (if you are coding, for example) is tiring. Even simple sunglasses are, not talking about a bulky headset. And, as someone also mentioned, there really must be an excellent screen for your eyes not to bleed after a long session of reading. Never tried this headset, but have serious doubts. Watching a movie is different, but at this price point you are likely getting a royally good home set up, so yet again, travel only. Again, a niche thing.

              Then there is some CAD stuff, but cannot comment there. How many people in the world need that, anyway?

              This leaves games as a real (though still relatively niche) market, yet to see what Apple has to offer there.

              So, as I can see, if Apple wants a new big thing, we are still waiting for a killer app. And a breakthrough in tech, of course.