The recipe for “fresh baked bread” that the wrapper claims to be baked “every day - Homemade Style”. Apparently, an incredibly clever AI model has come up with something truly special and delicious here - but I still really hope the kebab shop doesn’t start baking its flatbread that way - even if “it will bring more chewi”:

“I clove garlic, crushed
I quantity tunc btini mixture, Kcupf (75g) whole -egg miyoBiuiK
1 tablespoon (om Jto paste
1 tablespoon Worcestershire uuce
2 tablespoons fresh breadcrumbs
sea salt and cracked black pepper
8 rashers bacon, rind removed
12 discs white bread, touted
bunec for spreading
2 vine-ripened tomato’s, sliced
50g baby lettuce leaves.
4 tablespoons store-bought fruit chutney”

  • notabot@piefed.socialEnglish
    26·
    6 months ago

    Rather than “AI”, that looks quite a bit like something that’s been badly scanned, run through a basic OCR to create text, which has then been laid out by someone who doesn’t write the language well enough to kniw it’s gibberish.

    The line “1 tablespoon (om Jto paste” for instance, was almost certainly “1 tablespoon tomato paste”. You can see the similarity oin the character shapes between the gibberish and real text.

    ETA: It’s still mildly infuriating that soneone would waste the paper printing this nonsense though.

    • ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      6 months ago

      The other poster has the image that was likely plagiarised by the unscrupulous vendors manning the slop machine.

      General purpose or image-focussed models have weak OCR so they tend to hallucinate / extrapolate, resulting in this gobbledygook.

    • NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.comEnglish
      1·
      6 months ago

      Agreed, this is classic for that. Even a perfectly scanned document into OCR almost always has errors. I have set it up for a lot of people and I always stress that you need to go in and review what got scanned because there has never been a time I have seen it get everything spelled correctly or in the right format as it was.

      Same as AI. Anything you get from an LLM should be reviewed. Too many people just blindly trust whatever gets spit out without ever reviewing.

  • Naich@piefed.worldEnglish
    23·
    6 months ago

    So presumably a single cupf is the equivalent of 0.075g of whole-egg miyoBiuiK.

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zipEnglish
    181·
    6 months ago

    I don’t think its AI, I think its cheaply reproduced and done over and over again.

    If it was AI, I don’t think I would care, for this use case it doesn’t matter.

    Here is one of the original, they are available everywhere:

    I agree with the other poster, seems like someone took the original, probably changed the language, eventually changed it back and did OCR. Or some nonsense like that. You can find them online in all sorts of various states of degredation.

    Full size here: https://files.catbox.moe/1sjplb.png

    • ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      6 months ago

      It’s not the same. Likely this is the very image that was fed into the AI, and the printed result sold online.

      AI and OCR have converged, though in most general purpose models it’s not very good.

      This pattern is now a very common copyright avoidance tactic used to produce low quality goods.

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zipEnglish
        1·
        6 months ago

        It’s not the same. Likely this is the very image that was fed into the AI, and the printed result sold online.

        Given that these sell online, all over the place already, what would be the point? I doubt there is copyright, so it seems strange.

        Then again what would be the point of OCR either. Back in the day we had generational degradation from copying over and over again, but this does look different.

        Either way: meh. AI or not. Its throw away clipart.

        • ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          6 months ago

          Fair enough, in which case, it could be unintentional, the result of using a generative model to “upscale” it for printing, rather than a deterministic upscaler

  • halcyoncmdr@piefed.socialEnglish
    12·
    6 months ago

    How the fuck did it spell Worcestershire correct but not the word sauce immediately after it?

    Even dumbass autocorrect can do that. Spicy autocorrect can’t?

  • uhmbah@lemmy.caEnglish
    3·
    6 months ago

    I fucking love Worcestershire uuce! Thanks for the recipe. Gonna make this on my next trip to Barsoom.