• Che Banana@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Is this not a case of an unavailable accusers? In other words, Traffic Cams have time and again been overturned as unconstitutional because you have the right to face your accusers?

    Pretty sure Tom from IT can rustle up a laptop to take to court but…Facial Recog. is some bullshit 1984 bullshit.

      • drislands@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not just that, according to his lawyers in the article, he was 2 thousand miles away when the robberies happened that he was “identified” as being at.

      • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        After experiencing my own false memories and how easy they came to me, I will never, ever trust an eyewitness account. Give me video proof or gtfo.

        No one should trust another human’s account as being 100% accurate and true. The only thing that’s trustworthy are recordings from secure sources.

        • meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Video proof can be deepfaked now. We’ll need to have recordings capture public keys of people in frame so they can be verified as real or not.