As far as I know, the big damage from Nuclear Weapons planetside is the massive blastwave that can pretty much scour the earth, with radiation and thermal damage bringing up the rear.

But in space there is no atmosphere to create a huge concussive and scouring blast wave, which means a nuclear weapon would have to rely on its all-directional thermal and radiation to do damage… but is that enough to actually be usful as a weapon in space, considering ships in space would be designed to handle radiation and extreme thermals due to the lack of any insulative atmosphere?

I know a lot of this might be supposition based on imaginary future tech and assumptions made about materials science and starship creation, but surely at least some rough guess could be made with regards to a thernonuclear detonation without the focusing effects of an atmosphere?

  • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, it takes incredible amounts of energy just to move unarmored ships slowly around our own solar system.

    Seems like adding armor would make them so heavy and slow that they wouldn’t be worth using.

    • rambaroo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah that’s why any reasonable hard sci-fi has to rely on highly advanced fusion or speculative energy technologies