• bartolomeo@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t really get the logic: is an older claim or a more recent claim to land “more valid”?

    • MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      A recent claim is better. I care about the partitioning of the lands with the Sykes Picot Agreement, I don’t care about some inbred king of sandland did back in 147AD.

      • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Wouldn’t this mean that the millions of Israelis born in Israel over the last 80 years probably have the strongest claim to the land (at least the internationally recognized 1967 borders anyway)? 1916 is not particularly recent