Netflix Resumes Advertising on X After Elon Musk Controversy::Netflix has resumed advertising on X following a suspension by the streamer and other brands after Elon Musk promoted an antisemitic post.

  • Andy@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    What if we transition away from capitalism non-magically?

    • assembly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean that’s probably the preferred path but I can’t see how that realistically happens. There are too many individuals globally with too much to lose that will think their loss of capital is worth bringing down the whole human race. I’m sure they would rather see the world in ashes rather than succeed under an alternate system where they may not be on top.

      • colforge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s not even about being on top or being worried about losing status - I’d be fine with giving up what little I have to see a better world. The problem is that a pivot away from capitalism isn’t going to happen without violent revolution, because it would absolutely be met with violent resistance.

        I wouldn’t support something that would be guaranteed to thrust my children and grandchildren into a world of chaos, uncertainty, and tragedy that would unavoidably arise during and potentially after a revolution of that scale. And someone has to be holding the levers of power in the end, and how do we guarantee that we don’t just end up shuffling the deck around but playing the exact same game?

        It’s easy to be idealistic and say “this isn’t working” but it’s a whole lot harder to convince enough people to dismantle it and deal with the consequences rather than attempt to effect incremental change over a long term.

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think there’s a credible case to be made that moving toward socialism has benefits even for the wealthy, and that the change doesn’t have to be presented as the end of capitalism.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Why don’t you take a list of countries by quality of life from some point in the past decade or two, and see which nations seem to always top it.

        Spoiler: they’re the ones with hybrid economies and highly regulated markets.

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Do you not know what a “mixed economy” is? Did you even look at a list? Denmark, Norway, Sweden… You think these are "capitalist free-market countries"and that’s why they top the list?

            The reason those countries are at the top of the list for quality of life is because they have regulations on their markets, and robust social safety nets.

            Maybe actually do a few minutes of honest, open minded research about quality of life.

              • prole@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                For fuck sake. I will repeat my question:

                Do you not know what a mixed economy is?

                Because no, they are not purely “capitalist free market economies.” At all.

                Perhaps that bit isn’t covered in the one book you’ve read?

                  • prole@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    The fuck does that even mean?? Assuming you’re just too embarrassed to ask, I’ll lay it out for you:

                    Those Scandinavian countries have mixed economies. The “mixed” in there is referring to a combination of market capitalism and socialism.

                    Common to all mixed economies is a combination of free-market principles and principles of socialism.

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed_economy

                    The markets are highly regulated. Many services that are run by private enterprises in the “free market capitalism” that you’re referring to (i.e. Laissez-faire) are instead nationalized, removing the profit motive from services that improve the lives of every citizen. They have very strong social safety nets and universal health care.

                    It’s no coincidence that those nations consistently top those lists.