fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoProton Mail founder vows to fight Australia’s eSafety regulator in court rather than spy on users | Australia news | The Guardianwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up1931arrow-down110
arrow-up1921arrow-down1external-linkProton Mail founder vows to fight Australia’s eSafety regulator in court rather than spy on users | Australia news | The Guardianwww.theguardian.comfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square97fedilink
minus-squarebattle009@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down2·11 months agoThis. Anarchism is not the way, democratic control is. Structurelessness only leads to tyranny of another kind. Read Jo Freeman’s thoughts on this concept: https://jacobin.com/2019/09/tyranny-structurelessness-jo-freeman-consciousness-raising-women-liberation-feminism
minus-squareLev_Astov@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·11 months agoYou can debate anything if you’re stupid enough.
minus-squarekool_newt@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-210 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarecannache@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoAgreed. Essentially the big reason many people support the idea of a government is simply because it is an effective deferral of responsibility for certain issues. The most effective example is unironically the existence of the government “benefit”.
This. Anarchism is not the way, democratic control is.
Structurelessness only leads to tyranny of another kind. Read Jo Freeman’s thoughts on this concept:
https://jacobin.com/2019/09/tyranny-structurelessness-jo-freeman-consciousness-raising-women-liberation-feminism
Debatable
deleted by creator
You can debate anything if you’re stupid enough.
deleted by creator
Agreed. Essentially the big reason many people support the idea of a government is simply because it is an effective deferral of responsibility for certain issues. The most effective example is unironically the existence of the government “benefit”.