flop_leash_973@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoEpic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square278fedilinkarrow-up11.59Karrow-down122file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldprivacy@lemmy.mlgames@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up11.57Karrow-down1external-linkEpic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightwww.theverge.comflop_leash_973@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square278fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldprivacy@lemmy.mlgames@sh.itjust.works
minus-squareDarkhoof@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up56arrow-down2·8 months agoIn the US it does.
minus-squareTheMurphy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up44arrow-down1·8 months agoYes, but US favour companies over people.
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·8 months agoI’m pretty sure the ruling in this post is in the US.
minus-squareRogueBanana@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down4·8 months agoThat’s why we are surprised. But given this went through, maybe they could go for it again who knows.
minus-squareagitatedpotato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-28 months agoAnd it’s two companies fighting, how far did the anti monopoly pushes against apple and google get before Epic took them up because they were a profitable venture?
minus-squareMr_Blott@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up40arrow-down1·8 months agoYeah but they also have more rights than the consumer, rather than the other way about lol
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoI’m pretty sure the ruling in this post is in the US
In the US it does.
Yes, but US favour companies over people.
I’m pretty sure the ruling in this post is in the US.
That’s why we are surprised. But given this went through, maybe they could go for it again who knows.
And it’s two companies fighting, how far did the anti monopoly pushes against apple and google get before Epic took them up because they were a profitable venture?
Yeah but they also have more rights than the consumer, rather than the other way about lol
I’m pretty sure the ruling in this post is in the US