• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    TLDR via notegpt

    • 🚀 Simplex Chat: A private and secure messaging platform without user identifiers.
    • 💡 Founder’s story: The startup was founded in 2021, with ideas dating back to late 2019.
    • 🌐 Join the group: Interested viewers can join the conference group to ask questions and try out the platform.
    • 💰 Privacy and cost: Lack of privacy in messaging platforms can cost users real money.
    • 🔒 Designing for privacy: Simplex Chat’s design removes the need for user identities, providing a high level of application-level anonymity.
    • ⚙️ Usability and future plans: Simplex Chat aims to be as usable as popular messengers while addressing the challenges of establishing connections and transfer anonymity.
    • 🌐 Future evolution: The network is evolving into a two-hop mix network to further protect IP addresses and enhance session isolation.
  • einfach_orangensaft@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    i like the whole concept but it seamed to good to be true and not some type of backdoored honeypot, ill guess ill check it out when enough people reviewed the sourcecode

    • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, since it was audited quite awhile ago you could probably check it out now.

      simplex.chat/blog/20221108-simplex-chat-v4.2-security-audit-new-website.html

    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      back when I was using reddit, whenever it would be posted in /r/privacy or /r/privacyguides it would get like 30 or 40 upvotes in a matter of minutes. for a service that came seemingly out of nowhere, it really felt suspicious to me.

      • moreeni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that’s because it’s the content for privacy subs. Now that it had been audited and privacyguides recommends it I put my trust into SimpleX

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oof, bad timing for that name selection. Especially with payment processing.

    The invitation method is interesting, but will likely be its limiting factor vs its draw. Regular Jane/Joe wants to share their username, just not their number or email. Not being able to share verbally is tough.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Simplex has been out for a year or so.

      It’s tough getting people used to systems that respect privacy, since Out-of-band ID sharing is part of that.

  • Gargari@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it a simple chat app or something like Telegram with channels and groups support?

    • moreeni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t have channels, only groups. It’s more like Signal with no phone number req but with worse UX as a trade off

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think they serve different (though related or overlapping) purposes.

          Briar started (IIRC) as a Bluetooth-only comm tool, and they’ve done a great job expanding what it can do (think it does Tor now?). Briar is not battery friendly, and the devs will tell you so. I don’t consider it a daily driver, but rather for specific circumstances. I keep it around just-in-case.

          SimpleX is more of a daily driver since it’s a more conventional IP networking app, though it’s a little battery hungry too.

            • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yea, it’s a different tool. And it’s still early days.

              I don’t use SimpleX as a daily driver, yet. But it has a lot potential. Just glad to see another tool out there, and the devs seem really earnest (I worked with them a year ago while testing the app).

                • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Lol, welcome to the club!

                  God how I despise SMS, and I can’t get anyone off it, even if other options are easier to use than SMS, much more robust, faster, more flexible, etc.

                  There are a couple messaging apps that are self-hostable (like I believe SimpleX is). Litewire is one. At some point I plan on hosting one myself, and preconfigure accounts for friends/family to make it even easier for them. Maybe that will get them on board.

          • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            My main concern wit Briar is that it would be of not much use without a smartphone (I meant the internet-less features in particular). I would not trust sensitive things to a smartphone. I wonder if soemthing like that could be doable with an Android VM or Waydroid with a laptop’s bluetooth…

            • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Maybe. Check out Android Subsystem for Windows. It’s essentially an Android VM though you don’t have a launcher/home screen. You just see the apps in your task bar like any windows app. I run it on an older laptop, it’s a touch slow but works well enough.

              https://github.com/MustardChef/WSABuilds

              • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Windows is as much of a spyware as an average smartphone though, so not much of a point.

                Edit: I should try it in Waydroid then.

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks.

        So it has a new ID for each tunnel/channel/whatever. As usual, that comes with the downside of discoverability: how do you find all your contacts when installing the app? You always need an out of band transfer of the user ID - be it email, username, or a transient one like this.

        I’m not sure how much better that is than existing chat apps that don’t have discoverability.

          • onlinepersona@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            How?

            If the OOB is not encrypted --> hello MITM attack or impersonation (unless of course you’re physically in the same place, which is quite limiting)

            If it’s encrypted, why not just keep using encrypted channel? I have to find an encrypted channel to initiate an encrypted chat?

            I’m not seeing the benefit