• Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    19 hours ago

    If anything, I disgendered English.

    No you didn’t, masculine is still a gender. I’m totally willing to believe that this was an innocent mistake to begin with but by tripling down on it like this you’re just being a dick.

    It’s not my fault English isn’t gender neutral when I am. I naturally speak and think in a way that does not account for gender.

    You understand that English does have gender neutral pronouns, right? “His” just isn’t one of them. At any rate, given that Rose has her pronouns in her display name there’s no need to use neutral language anyway.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Calm down guy, it doesnt even seem like the person you’re talking about took offense with it. Why claim their outage for your own?

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Name a gender-neutral singular third person pronoun from English that isn’t “it” (calling people “it” in English is very offensive, but in Finnish it’s just natural colloquialism, but I know enough to avoid that in English)

      • clickyello@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        they

        eta: to degender your comment you could say “this person knows their junkies”

        but being as you’ve been beaten over the head with the fact that the OP uses she/her pronouns that would also be misgendering her.

        leaving it as using a masculine pronoun is rude at best and blatantly transphobic at worst. nobody thinks you were being actively harmful when you said it but not being willing to change it is toxic.

        you’re not the hero here.

            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              16 hours ago

              How could they be wrong? They apologized and explained that it isn’t intentional and why. What exactly do you need to be happy here, seppuku?

              • CharmOffensive@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                16 hours ago

                They didn’t apologize, they doubled down with some of the most insipid bullshit about pronouns not existing in English and how they’re “depronouning english”, despite defaulting to using the masculine, instead of just saying “oh yeah, I didn’t see the name, I’ll edit my comment”.

                • Madison420@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  An appology doesn’t have to say sorry if they aren’t sorry dude. They explained it and hilariously the person minging about it the most immediately assumed the person you’re mad at’s gender which is just hilariously hypocritical.

                  oh yeah, I didn’t see the name, I’ll edit it my comment".

                  That’s literally what they said minus I’ll edit my comment. So what’s the benefit of editing the comment? Will it reverse time or remove context so you not rose will be less offended.

                  • CharmOffensive@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    15 hours ago

                    An apology does have to say sorry or it’s just an explanation. If they aren’t sorry, they’re not apologising, they’re just telling you what happened in a way that takes 0 responsibility.

                    I know all I need to about you from this one simple statement and now realise you’ll be too pig headed to approach this in any way other than antagonistically in a desperate attempt to browbeat the other person into submission. Because for you, it’s not about reaching consensus, it’s about your own ego.

                    You do you bro, I don’t care enough about anyone in this debate to bother responding anymore. Peace.