Since October 7, more than 3,257 children have been reported killed, including at least 3,195 in Gaza, 33 in the West Bank, and 29 in Israel, according to the Ministries of Health in Gaza and Israel respectively. The number of children reported killed in just three weeks in Gaza is more than the number killed in armed conflict globally – across more than 20 countries – over the course of a whole year, for the last three years.

  • shatal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    To make it perfectly clear - the fact that children are dying is reprehensible and it should be stopped. Even if one innocent child died, from both sides, it’s one too many.

    That being said, this is a very good example of propaganda by partial information and numbers manipulations.

    The UN report in question identifies anyone under the age of 18 as a child. The Al-Qassam brigades recruit teens from the age of 16 to active combative roles (some reports suggest an even younger age).

    It’s impossible to know how many of these 3,257 children are actually children and how many are armed teens, and the UN report references that. The propaganda completely ignores this part and reframes this information as if more than 3,000 young and innocent children were slain.

    • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      A worldwide charity that’s existed for 100 years, whose exclusive mission is trying to save children from war, is a very good example of propaganda? Please explain this, because you say that one is too many but then you say “don’t fall for this guys, it’s not nearly that many.”
      Are you saying it’s ok to murder minors because they’re armed? Are you saying that’s why these minors were murdered? Do you have proof of this? Because your statements seem to be the ones which are unfounded and sound a lot like propaganda to excuse the murder of thousands of children.

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A common tactic by propagandists is to call inconvenient information propaganda. It’s like how fascists tend to blame their opponents for engaging in behavior that only the fascists are actually engaging in.

        • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Eh, I generally feel like anything aimed at people under 18 in the context of an air bombardment is still not a justifiable murder. I’m with ya, Hamas fucked up. What they did is indefensible, but also taking a life from someone who hasn’t even had the opportunity to understand the world and the chance to make those bigger decisions from a grown place yet is very wrong to me.

          If it’s a battle, back and forth, firing guns, kill or be killed, I guess that’s just how it shakes out. I don’t expect someone to just let themselves be shot there by a minor (whether they should be there is another story, but ok). But If you just have suspicions this kid is an enemy, or you see them with a gun, or hell you even have solid evidence that kid has been recruited as a child soldier, I don’t think you get to judge them with death by bomb outside the moment. That’s part of what’s so difficult in discussing or defining what constitutes a child soldier or a legitimate target. These kids already got robbed of so much in their ability to live a normal childhood. In America countless black kids were cast as “super predators” in the 90’s in much the same way. I respect where your coming from and don’t doubt your sincerity but believe we just have a difference of opinion on this matter.

          According to this NPR article, the age range both you and the commenter are describing (15-19) represents 10.6% of the male population. The combined totals below them = 40.8% of the population. So what, a fifth = 639 of them in that age range died. Then what percentages of those deaths are militants? Say 50% So 320? Out of 3,195?

          Obviously you can’t account for distribution and other factors without further info, but still I think that it’s more right than it is wrong then by any stretch of the imagination. You’ve stated similar stuff up the thread but I just don’t feel like to cast this as propaganda by numbers manipulation or partial information is a statement that can be taken at face value, given that the lack of numbers and information are a byproduct of intentional suppression by the power committing the offensive.

            • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              A totally fair point. You spoil us all with your reasonable, genial demeanor and commitment to calling out bias.

            • shatal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Just one inaccuracy - there were no settlers in Gaza for nearly 20 years.

              • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s not inaccurate. He said Palestine. That’s more than just Gaza, it’s the West Bank+ as well. And they have been under absolutely relentless attacks (and murders) by settlers, especially since the 7th. Even though they are divided, they are one people. It’s not like those kids in Gaza don’t know that.

                • shatal@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I was referring to “It’s small wonder that people support Hamas and children join the only force that seems to be fighting for them”.

                  There’s little love (and that’s a huge understatement) between Hamas and the PLO and children in the west bank rarely join Hamas.

                  • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    He literally never said anything about settlers in Gaza, which was what you said and are now shuffling around. I’ll leave it there though because I think your agenda is quite clear now and he is more than capable of responding if he likes.

        • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hamas is a terrorist group.

          Israel isn’t an equivalent. Its a fully fledged nation state with sophisticated military and intelligence agency. Israel’s behaviour should be measured based on how a nation state should act. Not a terrorist group.

          If you think Israel is justified in killing children because Hama’s did. Your arguing Israel is a terrorist state, just one your sympathetic to.

          I don’t think we should compare Israel to the standards we hold for terrorists. Because we don’t have any standards for terrorists. Additionally Israel’s capability for killing far exceeds what Hamad can achieve.

          All the deaths due to the recent Hamas attack is the best Hamas can do. How many people could Israel kill, probably all 2 million in the Gaza strip.

          Extremist Christians and extremist Zionists have wanted this for a long time. Only tempered by the west’s intolerance for mass killing. Since the Hamas attack the US and UK have both morally approved of moving into to Gaza.

      • shatal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A worldwide charity that’s existed for 100 years, whose exclusive mission is trying to save children from war, is a very good example of propaganda

        Absolutely, 100%. Human rights organisations are not unbiased news outlets - they have agendas and objectives. Their objectives are commendable ones, and the work they do is invaluable, but they still utilise propaganda as a means to an end. As good and important as this end is, their reports should be received with the same amount of caution and critical thinking as any report coming from anyone with an objective in this.

        you say that one is too many but then you say “don’t fall for this guys, it’s not nearly that many

        That’s just a straw man. I never suggested that it’s not that many. It can be 3,257 and it could be 0. I just pointed out the information manipulation.

        Are you saying it’s ok to murder minors because they’re armed

        It’s never ok, but unfortunately this is war and war is shit. An ak47 in the hands of a 12 years old can kill just as well as one in the hands of a 20 years old.

        Another point for you to consider is that traditionally, in the Philippines, Yemen, Afghanistan, Iraq, Cambodia, many regions of Africa and essentially wherever there were children-soldiers, the ones that indoctrinated them, trained them and placed firearms in their hands were the ones who were blamed for their deaths.

        You seem to hold Israel as the only one accountable for it.

        • filister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So could you clarify your point:

          1. “kill every kid that’s holding a gun, no matter the age”, or
          2. kill kids between 16-18 as long as they hold a gun I am really curious.

          And while at it, could you please clarify the morality of killing kids in their beds by bombing the houses they are living in? Or we should just preemptively kill any kid as they might turn into future terrorists.

          Oh and by the way, I am pretty sure the Palestinian population are viewing the Israelian as terrorists and Hamas as liberators the same way you see Palestinians and IDF. So the terrorist designation all depends on the point of view and who’s in charge.

          Not defending Hamas, giving you just some food for thought maybe and if you disagree with this statement, could you provide me a definition of a terrorist and try to apply it through the eye of the regular Gazan.

          • shatal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I really couldn’t say in this case, and I’m very happy that I’m not the one that has to make this choice . Quite a few soldiers in conflict areas lost their lives because they couldn’t either.

            And while at it, could you please clarify the morality of killing kids in their beds by bombing the houses they are living in?

            Read my first sentence in the original message.

            So the terrorist designation all depends on the point of view and who’s in charge

            There’s point of view and there is the international law. The legal terms is that the IDF is a country’s military and as such it is expected to uphold international treaties, it is held to high standards and it receives a lot scrutiny when it goes out of line or makes mistakes. Hamas is a terror organisation and therefore none of this applies to it, but also killing its operatives is not considered murder or a war crime.

            If you’re asking for my personal opinion - it’s about intent. Organisations that have the clear intentions to kill and hurt as many civilians as possible are clearly terrorist organisations. Internationally recognised organisations that do not and try to minimise civilians casualties are not. Everything in between is a case by case gray area.

            I can’t attest to what the average person in Gaza thinks, but I reckon after 20 years of Hamas rule a lot of the people are already indoctrinated and their world view, specifically regarding Jewish people, is at least somewhat detached from reality. This is clearly reflected in the pro Palestinian Arabic social media profiles.

            • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The terrorist designation of a group is specific to the countries calling that group a terrorist group. Most nations of the world actually do not designate Hamas as a terror group. There is still a responsibility for a state military to adhere to international laws of conflict when engaging a non-state group.

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Making even Palestinian children look like potential terrorists is the real propaganda here. Easier to kill a child if you think they could be a soldier. You’re not able to confirm this nor can anyone, but you are prepared to go on this “hunch”, make children of Gaza less like children and more like military so that killing them is easier to stomach.

          The only way to deescalate is to give Palestinians justice. There is no benefit to Israel from carpet bombing Gaza

        • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are the ones dropping the bombs on them in a city they surrounded with walls? When should they be held to account for these virtual murders? This is an offensive action, not a defensive one. These kids aren’t coming at soldiers in waves, they’re being crushed under rubble from bombs dropping on the places they are attempting to find safety. Whole families dying like that.

    • ???@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s impossible to know how many of these 3,257 children are actually children and how many are armed teens,

      And if they were armed teens, should we kill them? The ministry of health published the numbers. You can choose whatever age you deem acceptable for the Qassam Brigades and do some math to get the “real” number of children victims, if you like.

      It’s impossible to know how many of these 3,257 children are actually children and how many are armed teens,

      All of them are fucking children. Everyone under 18 is a child. Stop this bullshit.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s disingenuous to suggest however there isn’t a difference between civilians and fighters. Either way though, yeah, they’re all children. I don’t know if it’s more horrifying for a child soldier to be killed vs a civilian child either. It’s two different kinds of horror.

      • shatal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Bigger font doesn’t make you more right.

        You can choose whatever age you deem acceptable for the Qassam Brigades and do some math to get the “real” number of children victims

        That’s just the thing with manipulating numbers - we can’t do the math. That’s why it’s so effective and why you need to apply critical reading to these kind of reports.

        And if they were armed teens, should we kill them

        Answer me this - say you have a group of people preparing to launch a rocket. That rocket is inaccurate but they aim it towards a city. There’s a high chance that you’ll be able to intercept it, but there’s always a chance that it’ll fall on a building and kill civilians.

        You can target this group, drop a bomb on them and stop them from firing this rocket. Now you learn that 2 of them are 17 years old. Do you drop the bomb? Or do you let them fire the rocket?

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          In that example, I would be in prison because I refused to join the IDF.

          • shatal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            So by avoiding any action you would allow them to fire the rocket.

            I understand and respect that.

            It’s a huge gray area and just one example of the complex morality component of this conflict.

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              By avoiding being part of the apartheid system of Israel, I’m one step in the right direction.

    • Aleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      The propaganda completely ignores this part and reframes this information as if more than 3,000 young and innocent children were slain.

      The only thing that’s really propaganda here is your comment. A child conscripted to fight in a war is still a child, and no amount of pretending otherwise by propagandists like yourself will change that fact.

      • shatal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The only thing that’s really propaganda here is your comment

        How so?

        A child conscripted to fight in a war is still a child

        I agree, but I’ll copy what I answered the other comment about this exactly: It’s never ok, but unfortunately this is war and war is shit. An ak47 in the hands of a 12 years old can kill just as well as one in the hands of a 20 years old.

        in the Philippines, Yemen, Afghanistan, Iraq, Cambodia, many regions of Africa and essentially wherever there were children-soldiers, the ones that indoctrinated them, trained them and placed firearms in their hands were the ones who were blamed for their deaths.

        You seem to hold Israel as the only one accountable for it.

        • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You just don’t get to throw up your hands and say “thats war.” This is not normal and should in no way be normalized (as you seem to be attempting to do.)

          edit: a word

          • shatal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re ignoring the main points and attacking a straw man again.

              • shatal@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                Reasoning? Critical thinking? Logic? Seeing things as complex rather than one side is 100% correct and the other is 100% at fault? Answering to the point instead of bombastic statements or disinformation aimed to trigger emotional responses?

                Stop behaving like a fanatic.

                • ???@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Hey you’re the one who is suggesting we redefine what childhood is to excuse more of Israel’s crimes.

                  • shatal@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You keep attacking straw men.

                    There are children soldiers and Gaza. There are 16 and 17 years old (and younger) that have active combative roles. You don’t have to look far to find them, just go to the Hamas and Gaza social media profiles and see the profiles of their operatives.

                    It’s deplorable, it’s tragic, but it’s the reality.

                    I’m not redefining childhood and I’m not supporting killing of children. I do say that when reading these kind of reports you should be aware that they show only a part of the information.

                • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s neither reasonable nor logical to justify the murder of innocent children. And yet here you are…