itsnicodegallo@lemm.ee to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 25 days agoThis post is the ”_____”lemm.eeimagemessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1419arrow-down111
arrow-up1408arrow-down1imageThis post is the ”_____”lemm.eeitsnicodegallo@lemm.ee to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 25 days agomessage-square59fedilink
minus-squareFleetingTit@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down5·25 days agoBoth sexes can have or lack tits. So the first one is okay, the second one is sexist.
minus-squarechonglibloodsport@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·25 days agoWho said anything about sex? I’d rather read an essay comparing these:
minus-squareRiskable@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·24 days agoJust keep these fellas out of it:
minus-squarechonglibloodsport@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·24 days agoThey’ll eat all the nuts for sure!
minus-squareShareMySims@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down4·edit-225 days agoIn the same way people of all genders can have tits, so can people of all genders have nuts, so if that’s your reasoning, either both are sexist, or neither are.
minus-squareFleetingTit@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down4·25 days agoIf you read my comment carefully you will notice that I was talking about Sex, not Gender.
minus-squareelidoz@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·25 days agoovaries are just nuts in the inside
minus-squareRiskable@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·24 days agoI Snickers at this comment.
minus-squarePumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·24 days agoColloquial “sexism” is heavily based on gender, so if you want to be precise you should probably use another phrase entirely
minus-squareShareMySims@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down5·edit-225 days agoAnd if you knew anything about either, you’d know that both are a spectrum, so your argument is still invalid https://scatter.wordpress.com/2022/01/30/sex-as-a-social-construct/ https://www.nature.com/articles/518288a
minus-squareTriflingToad@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·24 days agoyo this debate is the tits 🔥🔥
Both sexes can have or lack tits. So the first one is okay, the second one is sexist.
Who said anything about sex? I’d rather read an essay comparing these:
Just keep these fellas out of it:
They’ll eat all the nuts for sure!
In the same way people of all genders can have tits, so can people of all genders have nuts, so if that’s your reasoning, either both are sexist, or neither are.
If you read my comment carefully you will notice that I was talking about Sex, not Gender.
ovaries are just nuts in the inside
I Snickers at this comment.
Colloquial “sexism” is heavily based on gender, so if you want to be precise you should probably use another phrase entirely
And if you knew anything about either, you’d know that both are a spectrum, so your argument is still invalid
https://scatter.wordpress.com/2022/01/30/sex-as-a-social-construct/
https://www.nature.com/articles/518288a
yo this debate is the tits 🔥🔥
Yes.