Absolutely general purpose. In the most simple terms, email, password hash, and a bit of metadata
Absolutely general purpose. In the most simple terms, email, password hash, and a bit of metadata
‘kermits mean girlfriend’ is just such a wonderful description haha
As someone who sees these articles, who should I not vote for? Is there some ranking for ‘most asshole-ish politician’ regarding the EU? I know every politician has somewhat dirt on them but I’d love to know what to avoid since apparently some of those turds are worse than others.
This is what I had in mind as well; If you had to how would you add a beamer to this that could use your jellyfin/plex server?
Ideally I’d want a pi or mini pc behind the beamer that I can switch on/off remotely so that part is not always on
Okay I never knew that, I would also accept tips for setting up a star trek beamer though xD
In general the article seems to be a summary of current legislative actions that are ongoing between big tech and EU. Though in the article it’s worded with the much more fitting ‘game of chicken between EU and Big Tech’ rather than something like the title, but I guess “drop dead has a better ring to it”…
I general the article has a lightly optimistic tone, which I very deeply hope holds true.
Beg? Or am I misunderstanding this?
Aahh OK so they are the IDFs responsibility and they are being purposefully neglegent, makes sense to be trialed for that.
Assuming these are unaffiliated civilians (which I am assuming here that these people are just assholes who hate Palestinians) can they be trialed for this as a war crime?
Which would also be worse than the events being unrelated. In the simplest case it’d be guilt-tripping ( you owe me!) or at worst some sort of odd blackmail.
[…]Plants vs. Zombies Jordan Adams, and Director Partnerships at EAX Matthew Angeleri.
Adams would also send female coworkers pornographic videos and even reference them in EA Slack conversations
While that seemed like an act of goodwill, Angeleri privately sexually harassed said female coworkers and even followed it up with videos of himself having lewd acts performed on himself.
Why the article can’t just state what the allegations are and at whom is just annoying, so here you go.
What confuses me a bit is the sentence just before the allegations to Angeleri:
As for Matthew Angeleri, he invited his female coworkers to stay at his home with his wife while visiting Vegas where they were given free room and lodging. While that seemed like an act of goodwill, Angeleri privately sexually harassed said female coworkers and even followed it up with videos of himself having lewd acts performed on himself.
Like… What? What is the logical connection between these two sentences? There could be months or years between those two events? How do these two relate? This reads as two completely separate events. So one could just be an act of goodwill and afterwards he decided to be a prick. Or, first the was a prick and then felt bad and offered the coworker a place to stay?
And if the two events were concurrent that makes it immensely more creepy.
This seems to be posted on this forum with that title solely for rage-bait.
She clearly just-for-fun redesigned Wikipedia as if a modern company got a hold of it. Yes of course this would drive people in this forum up a wall, but that’s just not the point. This is also not about programming at all?
Don’t go around looking for content of other creators just to take it out of context and then bash it.
This is like you watched “we made marvel r-rated” from corridor digital (https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=k5-3eujJyZE) and then post about it, being pissed how they destroyed a superhero fantasy aimed at a wide audience and children and how noone would ever want something like that.
Calling her a bad designer just because you disagree with her design decisions is just mean. This entire post just makes it seem like you are specifically looking for things to hate…
I really think it’s disgusting to boldly claim this is just to protect children. Then get the proposal denied with very valid reasoning that everyone’s privacy would be compromised.
And then, a few months later, they have the exact same argument again with the same proposal as before… This seems deeply disrespectful of the subject matter
It feels like a someone is trying to steal a cookie from a cookie jar, but when mum said no you just try again the exact same way…
Have you heard of e os? https://e.foundation/e-os/
De googling your android is at least a possibility, ripping apple out of ios is not possible
/u/Chainweasel@lemmy.world explains this well, though I got a different take on the analogy.
Imagine you are trying to put air into a deflating balloon that’s about to ‘loose form’ that’s essentially what you are trying.
Put just enough air (energy/mass) into the star and it will stay stable, loosing as much as you put into it.
Too little and the star will dissolved, in this example you’d fully absorb it.
Too much and you are essentially infusing a star with so much mass that it explodes all over again.
If you are trying to stabilise a star this way, ideally, it would never even begin to go nova.
I’ve been using e os every since the fairphone 4 hit the market (and I got it quite fast). I think it’s absolutely great. A caveat which is funny to me and I like: Since the playstore service is missing, and micro G sinks every server request to Google, in app purchases via those systems are simply not a thing. Personally I love this si ce I have never needed or want to buy anything from any app; but it’s incredible to me that any ad that even tried to load, can’t
I am very reluctant to use WordPress at all because I’ve heard terrible things from multiple colleagues. It looks like something that’d get problematic at some point.