They can use up to 2 years (I think) of a previous term. LBJ could have had 2 full terms plus the remainder he had from JFK.

I have the exact same issue. Someone is blocking. I have a dedicated IP and still get hit.

I assume it’s not Boost.

the bot link has cvs, walmart, Walgreens in the url… that’s my guess, still not clicking it

At least an associates

I think Witcher 3 falls into the same problems listed.

• Witcher Sense
• Busy HUD
• Fetch Quests
• Given direction to go w/ mini-map
• Talks to self

I mean, I loved the game, but it’s not minimalist. It’s like playing a movie.

My oldest did have to take a personal finance class in high school (last year) and did cover things like retirement saving and different methods of. I think some places are trying.

Edit: I, on the other hand, had your experience.

close, they also have song of the year which is just for the songwriter. So record is the total sum of the recording with engineer and producer (according to the Grammy website).

yes/no. it is a single recording (song). Not sure it has to be a ‘single’. as maybe some bands/people may not put out a single.

I was just looking it up.

record goes to all involved (writer/produced/engineer)

Song of the year goes to the song writer.

edit.

maybe it should be pronounced like recording of the year.

Totally thought it was the one in MD

This is the first thing I thought of as well. It’s never been “just use what you want”. It got better for a while as JavaScript and CSS normalized. Now it’s trash again.

https://pi-hole.net/

It’s a network level ad-blocker by blocking at the DNS level.

It was originally meant to run on a raspberry pi, but will run in docker or other Linux os as well. Very light weight and a great self-host project. Been running for years and support via patreon.

you aren’t talking about the Monty Hall problem then

There are more infinite real numbers between 0 and 1 than whole numbers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countable_set

deleted by creator

But the issue is that by switching doors, you have a 66% chance of winning, it doesn’t drop to 50% just because there are 2 doors, it’s still 33% on the first door, 66% on the other doors (as a whole), for which we know one is not correct and won’t choose.

I found the easiest way to think about it as if there are 10 doors, you choose 1, then 8 other doors are opened. Do you stay with your first choice, or the other remaining door? Or scale up to 100. Then you really see the advantage of swapping doors. You have a higher probability when choosing the last remaining door than of having correctly choosen the correct door the first time.

Edit: More generically, it’s set theory, where the initial set of doors is 1 and (n-1). In the end you are shown n-2 doors out of the second set, but the probability of having selected the correct door initially is 1/n. You can think of it as switching your choice to all of the initial (n-1) doors for a probability of (n-1)/n.

I have a 2019 car and I think it’s now a warning light, but I do have a useless gauge for what my current mpg is that I would gladly swap with.

than