Tlist Ze File!
Tlist Ze File!
In fairness, the Church of England is hardly in the top tier of most horrible variants of Christianity.
Unless the religion OP was talking about was the England football team, in which case, yes.
Do you also travel around in an unmarked van?
So why haven’t you stopped the bombing?
It is a meme that trans girls like Fallout: New Vegas for reasons that I can’t entirely explain.
Context:
The Joke:
They have mistaken Patton Oswalt - who has a perfectly legitimate reason for being dressed as a ghost - for a villain. Because they are high.
My favourite games are Fallout: New Vegas and Celeste.
The enemy used expelliarmus.
Your pronouns are now /.
ow oof my bones and skin and organs
I always wondered how plumbuses got made.
I’m pretty sure that’s a dark souls boss fight.
I call Britain a shitty little TERF island all the time, and I’m from Lancashire if that helps.
I have it on good authority that no man is island entire of itself, but every man is a piece of the continent - a part of the main.
There seems to be a couple of people keeping the lights on at the project zulip but they are presumably busy with other things.
Sorry, I was thinking of other features covered by the Const Generics Project Group, like generic_const_exprs.
Thin line between opinion, free speech, and a lie.
And yet, it’s there. Just as it is in defamation law.
Who defines truth, hate speech, and opinion[?]
A jury of your peers and the Public Order Act 1986.
The US has free speech. Apart from all the exceptions it carves out and designates not protected speech, including but not limited to incitement, threats and harassment, sedition, and obscenity. Obscenity in particular was famously ‘defined’ for a while as “I know it when I see it”. So why draw the line at hate speech?
Is it not a weird state of affairs when saying “X is a paedo” is legally actionable but saying “trans people are all paedos and X is trans” isn’t, even week when X’s house gets burned down either way?
When the other side wins an election are you now the criminal?
Sure, the UK parliament could pass a law saying criticising the prime minister is now illegal. The courts will inevitably issue a declaration of incompatibility with human rights law, but the government, in theory, could ignore it. If the public swallows it. But there’s nothing really stopping that happening in the US either. Congress could pass a law making it illegal to criticise the president, and since the president gets to pick the judges, it could almost certainly come under the sedition exception to the first amendment if the president really wanted it to pass. If the public swallows it.
And that’s what it comes down to at the end of the day. Whether or not the public swallows it. For all the US right wing likes to harp on about freeze peach that sure doesn’t seem to apply if you want to say something bad about America or use the word cisgender. Do you really think the American public is much less likely to support authoritarianism than the British public?
Rust probably stabilise some of its experimental features before we can rewrite the world with it. Const generics for one. (I’d help out with the implementation if I could…)
The problem is that the noun class that is used to refer to you is based on your gender. As long as that is the case, grammatical gender will probably be the most apt name for the concept.