Somewhiteguy

100% if this is on a metronome at the highest tick rate possible.

People get mad when they feel like they weren’t ready for training, but to your point, that’s why we train. To make you more aware when the real thing comes. Check all of your links. Verify it’s real before just clicking through.

The issue has come from some companies threatening jobs when people don’t perform properly. I would love it if people saw this as just training and not a personal attack. You fell for the trick now how do you not get tricked next time? It might help if we did a quarterly report and put it on the intranet for people to see how many got clicked. Don’t make it a Wall-of-Shame, but a report to see how good things have been going. Put out sample emails that were the trickiest and what were the tells. Make Security a thing that is a growth aspect, not a shaming tactic.

Oh man. This is brilliant for phishing training. Get through some armor. Don’t let your biases get in the way. You can do a variation around this theme. One could be similar to above. Another is one that says you can opt-into this kind of thing by “Managing Preferences”. You’ll hit a large swath of people without them paying too much attention. I like this.

Same, put it all on in the closet or next to the bed, depending on current shoe location.

People who are putting on socks and shoes to be presentable outside of their house and have been barefoot or in sandals up to this point.

You see, I’m the guy who gives his opinion in those. The trick is to be actionable. Don’t complain about things you can’t give direct advice on how to correct. Be kind in how you communicate and give the benefit of the doubt in all of the language.

Don’t: Your management style is shit

Do: It is difficult to complete my work with the lack of understanding on the business direction. I would like this communication to come from my direct manager.

“Secret” just like those emails I get from HR asking my opinions about management that are completely anonymous, but don’t forward this email or share the link with anyone else because it’s just for me…

How much money would one presume 5 beers would that it would cover this many beers? Even if you’re buying at a local convenience store or at your local alcohol store this would be around $50? Who walks up to a place, sees an order of what they assume is 5 beers for that price and thinks, “Yeah that’s a fair price.”

It’s carsinisation but for cars. Everything evolves into a type of SUV. It makes sense since physics kind of dictates how aerodynamics works and engineers just have to work around that.

I’m looking forward to the day when we don’t have rear-view mirrors and just use cameras. Kind of surprised we haven’t just gone that direction already. Screens and camera tech has gotten good enough that we can do that pretty efficiently.

The issue I have with some of the more “modern” cars is getting rid of the door handles on the outside. These pop-out things are just a hazard for people in colder climates or places where dust and other ingress can cause problems opening the door. Although, it would be nice to have my kids walk up to the door and not jerk on the handle 2-3 times before I can get the keys out to unlock it.

Don’t forget to include the Pope (garlic)

Okay… so this is a thing places do. Good to know. I thought the crazy farmer at the maize maze locally had lost his last kernel with just a box full of this stuff for the kids to basically swim in.

1. Asiago and Jalepeno
2. A Brick
3. Their Vine was too long to post
4. 12v and about 100W. Try a battery booster while turning the ignition.

I was wondering when they’d land down here, and I’m not sure Baton Rouge or New Orleans are good places to try these stunts. Perfect place to lose some of your guys or at least find out how many people have unregistered firearms. Oh, ya’ll didn’t check to see if these people are “Constitutional Carry” participants… Seems like something you’d not want to try around these parts.

A minimum of 2 fully fluorinated carbon atoms instead of 1 is NOT broadening the definition. That’s narrowing it.

Think of the definition as a sluice gate. When you allow more things through, you’re opening it wider, therefore broadening the definition. I know it’s counter-intuitive sometimes to think of it like that. Narrowing the definition would be to let fewer things through, thus closing the gate.

Edit: Reading through the discourse below, I think I see the points made. It might should be reversed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_whistle_(politics)