![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
- What is live ammo doing on the set period
- What is the prop master doing? (Was there even one?)
It’s been forever since I’ve been to 4chan… I’m almost afraid to check out /b/
Cool cool…. What about the price? That’s all I care about at this point.
Oh yeah. That’d be stupid. Besides billionaires, sadly arms manufacturers are the one group you don’t mess with.
You mean there wasn’t a single hare left
Welp, Akram al-Satarri just got re-labeled from Journalist to Hamas by Israel…
Close… the way it was phrased it basically becomes up to the Supreme Court to decide what’s “official”
Humanity will likely survive. The earth will definitely survive. But in both cases, the question will be: What will it look like?
Have you met the current Supreme Court?
profiling the Bluetooth devices in my house
Uh, I hope you’re banning anyone with an iPhone from even getting within 10 meters of your house. Because their phone could easily just grab a list of all BT MACs (or hell, even WiFi MACs) it finds and then transmits that with its current GPS coordinates via its cell network. Doesn’t even need your network at all. And your wireless devices have to transmit their MAC addresses to work even if their not in pairing mode.
Yeah about that. They also want to get rid of birthright citizenship.
Terrorists. And I’m not throwing that word around in a manner to water it down
Look up Anycast when you get a chance.
You’re technically correct, you can use any of them. It’s honestly just a matter of preference.
That’s doable too. A lot of people don’t realize you can route all of those together. It’s even more fun as technically you can route private addresses across public links if you own both ends of the link. Used to see that done at a large ISP to route their internal network and it’d pop new networking admins minds.
ETA: I would use 192.x IPs for unrouted subnets like heartbeats or iSCSI.
Yeah. Here’s a breakdown of the allocations and their sizes:
Most home applications only need a single /24 (256 addresses) so they are perfectly fine with 192.168.0.0/24, but as you get larger businesses, you don’t use every single address but instead break it out by function so it’s easier to know what is what and to provide growth in each area.
I know what subnetting is for. That’s why I know which RFC range to use. I’m talking based on the number of devices and needed groupings, 172 is a good sweet spot where 198.x would be a bit tight and 10.x is complete overkill.
Here’s how it’s gonna work:
Because, sadly, some of those others are still in limbo, Canon will be more than happy to put things on hold “while preceding matters are sorted out”
So I guess I must be a leet haxor because of all the businesses I configured for the 172.x space because 192.168.x space was too small and 10.x space was way the hell too big.