if legislation was to be passed against this book, would it be called the “bye bible bill”?
if legislation was to be passed against this book, would it be called the “bye bible bill”?
all that’s fine and good, but one just needs to see your username to fathom what could potentially go wrong.
youtube bermudas.
or build in a return-to-factory-by-yourself feature into them.
someone misunderstood the way in which a pen is mightier than the sword.
topologically, though, isn’t that just the same as all speaking and listening? it’s all mouth to ear.
if anything, force-fitting 69 seems unduly contrived. like if you shake someone by the hand, the top of your palm 69’s the bottom of theirs. or if you give them a high-five, it’s the forefinger and pinky.
or if you respond to this comment, we’ll be 69ing each other’s eyes with our fingers.
i mean, isn’t it a submarine, after all?
wait, in the article, why is his left eye removed in the first photo and his right eye in the next?
since when are nazis so against electricity? or is it that she personally prefers gas?
i’d hate to see what’s “snow white” in this version.
conjecture: maybe autocorrect once got hold of “bugger” and things kind of evolved from there?
how would you feel about an article titled,
“This” word in article titles infuriates internet readers
it’s a tennis match that Sean Connery plays without a partner.
all of this could have been avoided if only that one pesky 2000 year-old book was banned to begin with.
so you’re saying it’s a shire waste?
scanning a random qr code has to be this generation’s plugging in an unknown usb drive.
especially since just reading the headline made me cry.
the chief irony of this game is turtles are supposed to be good at swimming underwater.
why would any of google’s customers pay to stuff its ads into such a broken feature?
it’s like embossing your logo within a toilet bowl – sure, a lot of people will get to see it but mostly only when it’s submerged in shit.