eyeroll yes. Do you think I support zionism?

I think I wasnt thinking clearly. sticked posts it doesn’t matter what the up/downvote ratio is, its still gets pushed to all. COrrect?

You people are worse than reddit

I have not seen evidence that the plurality of that instance is in favor of genocide. Im open to evidence. and ofc maybe I’m just not observant enough. But i have not noticed the majority in favor.

I LOVE BIG BROTHER ^/s

Its this kind of bad-faith accusative argument that I hate most, from wherever it comes.

Dang and I just made this account too. Time to find a new instance… Any recommendations? How is lemmy.today?

This whole process has looked sus to me. And on top of that, I don’t think voting by up/downvoting the post itself is a good way to call votes — it means a minority can pass a rule without it being even seen by the majority (not sure that matters in this case). Voting should be done in a top-level comment.

I have one house mate in his 70s and one in her 80s, and she has lung cancer. Luckily our social systems are taking care of them, barely; but that’s going away and the cost of living is rising way faster than projected.

Like cow tipping

No, the user is Jokes. This is /news @lemmy.world

The language of an abusive ex who knows it’s a lie even as they say it.

This is almost double the funding of NASA (1 year)

tldr: A CDC-funded, Danish research group. To study if withholding the Hepatitis B vaccine for 6 weeks after birth is detrimental (as opposed to at birth, as is standard). This research group already has a history of controversy about poor and misleading research practices leading to unusable science (also in Guinea-Bissau, also on thousands of children). They were awarded $1.6 mil in a non-compete proposal under CDC’s RFK Jr; who you might remember is an antivaxxer.

The article contains many links and more details.

the Cheat is to the limit

The world’s future is in a really frightening place right now. It looks like, with the US advocating for a world controlled by US, China, and Russia, that “they”* are literally trying to make 1984 happen with forever wars between colluding enemies and everything else that dystopia brings.

I agree, Epstein was a … not a pawn. Maybe a bishop.

*In this case we know some of who “they” are. Like the Heritage Foundation.

There is if you are rich enough.

If we’re going to live in a privacy-less world, it needs to be for everyone

Tried updating it. it’s https://archive.is/eU1K9 And Here’s the NYT article

*edit * had to update this too

The posted article is excellent and everyone should read it [techdirt always writes great stuff]. The story’s primary source is [this NYT article via archive.is. Every secondary source fail to mention “collateral aliens”, and I’m here to rectify that.

ICE is already arresting people just because an officer is suspicious. the NYT article is 2 things:

1. the director changing the justification of why it’s ok. That being: “the person might not be here later, so we have to arrest them now” … In reality they call this “likely to escape” (same difference).

2. The new thing is using this justification to arrest anyone who is nearby, who they call “collateral aliens”, in group round-ups.

In summary: A single ICE officer can think a dude on the corner looks wrong; can arrest him because he might not be there later; then arrest you just because you’re nearby. Now you’re a “collateral alien”, and have no due process and cannot plead your case.

hey, I saw that phrasing in a reddit comment. … its a good phrase though

Artistic choice. But good to know.