The point of this meme is me/us as the mere users of a website. Not from a hosting or administration perspective.

There is no gatekeeping, just a statement of a preference, as a user.

Buddy, this is a simple joke.

Nothing more.

The additional info is not the issue, that I have with this comment, and is instead greatly appreciated. But the way it is communicated is also somewhat rude.

I am very well aware, that Fandom is based on MediaWiki. That, however, does not weaken my point at all. tsg

My the actual intention of this joke, was to point out, that even if fusion will make again use of boiling water, we already have more “suffisticated” methods to generate electricity (like e.g. solar cells via the photovoltaic effect), that make not use of the great equalizer make wheel spin fast.

But based on many comments here (and yours is not one of them), this failed.

LLMs can already understand Leet. And it is not surprising, that they can, as it still exhibits the structures of a language, which LLMs are precisely designed to represent very well.

http://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/2014-04-11

Why Pets Have Surprisingly Small Brains - MinuteEarth - YouTube

“In economics, the Jevons paradox occurs when technological advancements make a resource more efficient to use (thereby reducing the amount needed for a single application); however, as the cost of using the resource drops, […] this results in overall demand increasing, causing total resource consumption to rise.” Wikipedia

Behold, Approximate True Colour Neptune

Wikipedia - Neptune - Colour

Actually not that blue, compared to Earth.

deleted by creator

If we would kill bacteria entirely, we would doom ourselves inevitably.

“There is no substantive evidence that Einstein wrote or spoke the statement above. It is listed within a section called “Misattributed to Einstein” in the comprehensive reference “The Ultimate Quotable Einstein” from Princeton University Press.”

So No. I also was always very irritated by this quote, because from a scientific point of view this is rather incorrect, as (like you said) experiments need to be repeated, to verify the results.

If it happened, but nothing happened, did it really happen?