i tend to use the pain scale to give me a hint on decisions like this. so i guess the first question to ask before the pain scale is “am i in a state of shock?”
note: i am not in any medical field nor had intensive training.
i tend to use the pain scale to give me a hint on decisions like this. so i guess the first question to ask before the pain scale is “am i in a state of shock?”
note: i am not in any medical field nor had intensive training.
for me, it is a craze because the food is not tested enough for its marketed effects.
sure, many other people also claim to feel its benefits but the numbers just ain’t enough, for me at least.
then again, not all people are the same. you can give it a shot for science. nothing wrong with trying.
Most people prefer more fps over image quality, so minor artifacting from DLSS is preferable to the game running much slower with cleaner image quality.
I don’t think we’re not much different in this portion. AI upscale is passable enough that gamers will choose it. If presented with a better, non-artifacting option, gamers will choose that since the goal is performance and not AI. If the stat is from PS data, and not from a poll, I think it just strengthens that users want performance more.
There will never be a set performance target again.
It’s not that there’s no set performance target. The difference is merely one, on the CounterStrike era, vs. many, now. Now, there’s more performance targets for PC than Counter Strike days. Games just can’t keep up. Saying “there will never be a set performance target” is just washing hands when a publishers/ directors won’t set directions and priorities which performance point to prioritize.
It might be that your point is optimizing for scalability, and that is fine too.
the premise seems flawed, i think.
i feel what he’s saying is: we suck optimizing gfx performance now because gamers deem ai upscale quality as passable
this feels opposite to what the ps poll says that gamers enable performance mode more because the priority is more stable frames than shiny anti aliasing/post processing.
yes, you are!
you should also ask chatgpt that after correcting it for a better effect.
pretty sure this is chatGPT mannerism
you can customize the serenity prayer as a form of mantra if it fits you more.
i use it as a constant reminder that life is what we make it to be.
old guy rambles “git off mah skewl” to make-believe gender transition ops.
weird school he went to.
chronoark lets you die and counts your deaths for you.
anything agatha christie/ hercule poirot is light detective work (good for kids and or newbies) with optional handholding
i remember there’s some good mystery modules with neverwinter nights
morrowind quests don’t coddle at all. they all look like journal entries.
rainylyn las… contacs…?
“if you dropped a coin (or other small object) and you can’t find it anymore, drop another coin and see where it goes.”
aside from great comments here, trump is associated with some religious imagery of having wings. even i can’t believe that flies.
nothing goes as tunnel vision as blind faith.
sub: top 12 hours, all: top 6 hours
this somewhat balances out feeds I missed on my subscribed list.
she weaponized the justice system against me…
the criteria for public leaders is low. aren’t branches of the government taught in elementary?
he got what he asked for. and more.
him being a representative means there’s a lot more that thinks this way.
my very eager mother just served us nine
rip pizzas
the part i like the most with the stanley parable is how the narrator (lines and voice acting) has handled each game route.
i feel there’s a mix of excitement and teasing there that makes you follow his lead.
also to add is the clarity of the voice. i didn’t need subs when i played the game.
In a way, you can say it is lazy journalism:
The journalist can say he lied, then state factual data – but then real life happens and someone points out this action is subjective, biased and is attacking some person. Maybe the journalist also needs cred power for people to believe his stance.
So to address objectivity in journalism, reporters just say what happened. No backtracking. No side references. Maaaaybe also pushed you their job to make sense of what it is.
There’s also a factor about sponsorship and money but that’s just money talk.
sorry, i also didn’t get anything close.
best i can do is bbb.
eff, as has been suggested, is also doing great things, but they’re not specifically the watchdog.