An interview with a Senate candidate is pretty clearly exactly what the framers had in mind for the first amendment. I can’t think of a more on-the-nose situation of government action that would be more applicable to the first amendment. Congress passed a law to create the FCC.
Congress shall make no law […] abridging the freedom […] of the press
Can’t really get more clearcut than that.
May be OS specific. I tried to re-lock the bootloader with LineageOS on my Fairphone 6+, and it failed with an error that the data was corrupted. It was my first time loading a custom ROM in probably 15+ years, so it definitely could have been user error, but not a guaranteed feature either way.
A short read, but I really got a lot out of it. One thing I’ve started losing with the rise of AI and didn’t realize until now is the communication with coworkers about current problems we’re working through. I reach out to people in the git-blame log, and others used to reach out to me. But now everyone asks the AI, so we’re even more siloed than before.
It feels less like we’re working together and more like we’re working next to each other.
Also the woman looks like she’s spitting out the food, not eating it.
I learned about JavaScript’s prototype-based inheritance model a decade ago. It’s different from every other major language, but it’s interesting and useful when used the right way. I’m astonished (1) people are still rediscovering “optimization” techniques like are described in the article when that’s how their constructors should have been designed from day-one, and (2) the JavaScript language still hasn’t added more language features to make the mutated-prototype inheritance pattern less verbose and more ergonomic. It’s a core architecture of the language and hasn’t been improved, it looks like, since the first time I read about it 10 years ago. They added the whole class syntax sugar to hide the differences in the language’s inheritance model, so they can add some improvements to the syntax for the better optimized inheritance pattern.
Good. Legitimate safety features should be opt-out rather than opt-in wherever possible.
Except they take all of the land and resources with them. You posit the billionaires have a fully automated robotic industry at their whim and they will leave any scraps for the rest of us? It would be judgment day from the Terminator series, except instead of a super intelligent Skynet AGI mowing down humanity it would be psychopathic pedophiles.
prompted questions about who bears responsibility for an AI agent that goes rogue.
That’s not a trivial question, but courts have had the concept of distributed weighted responsibility for decades. Does your company provide users with access to an AI agent you know aggressively finds illegal/unethical ways of completing prompts? Mostly the provider’s fault with small fault of the user submitting the prompt. Safer AI with a user who has crafted the prompt specifically to attempt to get the AI to break into a system? Higher weight on the fault of the user, smaller weight on the provider.
We assume that the AI boom is the result of market demand. In reality, it is the result of investment decisions made by concentrated capital, which is reshaping the economy on its own terms.
But that’s always been true under capitalism. It’s just that in the past generally large capital expenditures have gone towards things the wealthy think will get them more wealth. There have always been capitalists who spend their money directing the economy to do what they want, rather than what the “market” wants. They just haven’t had the majority of the capital being spent.
The last 50 years has seen an unprecedented concentration of wealth. The wealthy are literally a thousand times proportionately wealthier than poor people than they’ve been at any other point in human history. There’s not much wealth to squeeze out of everyone else, so the economy is even more at the vain whims of those with all the capital as they look for things to spend it on.
Tech news has been reporting for literal decades that Apple, Amazon, Google, and similar have been sitting on giant war chests of profit with nothing to spend it on. Well, they’ve found something they want to spend it on, so they’re emptying 20 years of profits in 5. They’ve now completely blown through those stores, and don’t want to slow down, so now they’re taking on unprecedented levels of debt. Something is going to give out and things are going to get bad within the next 5 years.
Given the news of multiple kids killing themselves because of ChatGPT, my first interpretation of this headline was that that was Altman’s response to the families of those kids. It doesn’t sound out of character for him. I’m glad my first intuition was wrong and reality was just stupidity, but I have to think it’s just a matter of time…
It’s worth stating that this is showing just the private company contributions (private as in not owned by national governments). State-owned oil companies of various nations contribute massively as well, so beyond the bribes lobbying problem there’s a direct conflict of interest for many nations that get a substantial amount of revenue from those state-owned oil companies.
You’re right. The FCC approved their requested use of radio spectrum for communication with the satellite. They were very clear they were giving approval for this one mission, and for the communication spectrum, not the visible spectrum.
It’s a web app and you just showed we can do it in text with Unicode and a modern browser. This bug is a level of self-inflicted, shouldn’t-be-in-the-realm-of-possible problem I struggle to comprehend. It’s the software version of not even wrong.
I think it’s technically not crop rotation because they’re supposed to be planted in the same field at the same time, right?
Following his speech, the president is planning on setting off fireworks for 40 minutes in an attempt to break the world record for fireworks. Firework manufacturers have said this will cost many millions of dollars, but the White House is yet to disclose exactly how much they are spending and how they obtained the funds.
Those USAID funds, and funding for dozens of other programs, aren’t going where they’re legally supposed to anymore, so probably from there.
After attending the Supreme Court hearing earlier this year, Trump falsely claimed in a Truth Social post that the U.S. is “the only Country in the World STUPID enough to allow ‘Birthright’ Citizenship!”
This is such a stupid and easily disproved take. I’ve had relatives claim to me that the US is the only country with birthright citizenship. It’s very common in the Americas.
And even if it wasn’t, and the US was the only country with birthright citizenship, isn’t that our choice as a nation? Do we have to do what other countries do? If we’re going to do that, can we start with universal healthcare and then revisit birthright citizenship after, say, better protections for unions, guaranteed parental leave, guaranteed vacation time, unlimited sick time, higher taxes on the wealthy, abolition of at-will employment, and about 100 other policies the US is the only wealthy nation either not to have or to have a legal framework against?
How is this not fraud?
After briefly pushing SpaceX’s market value close to $3 trillion, investors have begun reassessing whether the stock’s rapid advance can be justified by fundamentals.
Nothing in the stock market has been about fundamentals for a very long time. Especially regarding Musk companies.
Originally enacted in 1964 to protect workers during the transition from private to public ownership of mass transit, the provision now blocks the modernization of transit operations: no legacy US heavy-rail system has automated its operations to permit trains to run without onboard crew. In contrast, countries like France and Canada, each with robust labor protections, automate without conflict.
Okay, can we get those robust labor protections first, and then fully automate public transit?
Expect the Trump administration to follow their current winning strategy: consistently lose in lower courts, appeal every ruling until it gets to the Supreme Court, Supreme Court makes up some new bullshit from an intentional misreading of history and hands Trump a victory.