Maybe. I’m not advocating for a monopoly, I’m advocating for the death of one. Open-source hardware frameworks are possible, but not with Intel alive. Even if so, they wronged us all. The sentence is corporate dissolution. whap

I blame today’s Mtv video games

Don’t care. Death to Intel.

Well he seems like a reasonable and kind fellow.

Who just happens to like his scotch and yelling at people.

Heather always said she couldn’t accessorize for shit.

Well fuck me gently with a chainsaw

🤮

This bespells doom

Right, but the title doesn’t even mention a company. Why.

How is that Medicaid’s fault? Why isn’t the title something like “Medicaid providers buying unhealthy food with federal funds”

10 bucks says he had a dog named rambo.

The Telegraph has a paywall now. Bah.

Oh I see how you mean - no, they made out like bandits as usual and some wily interwebs commenter sniped them for it.

I don’t think the fairness doctrine legislated “truth” as such, though torpedoing it did usher in media conglomeration, talk radio fascism and a host of related bullshit. If it did, though that’d be interesting.

Sure. “Reasonable” dipshit republicans have turned over their house, their car, and all their accounts to Demented Orange Rapist & Co.

Now they get to knit their brows over it while doing nothing of any consequence to stop it.

Reaganjugend eh

Ah yes. that hard-hitting, timely reporting we’ve come to rely on.

?? Not sure which you mean

You’ll have to define “affect” and “negatively” but I would say there was a brief moment where on-air personalities apologized for sucking and even the NYT published a long piece about “what they could have done better”.

For anyone who pays attention to the “inside baseball” world of news, journalism, media, whatever - yeah they fucked up royal and knew it. Of course, they spent the trump administration forgetting that and normalizing his insanity, and of course here we are in the blender again even after his coup, his fraud, his national security burning self is A GODDAMNED FACT and yet - nothing. Not even a footnote in any story.

They’re referring to the Times’ editorial position not to refer to trump as a convicted felon, a rapist, a fraud, indicted for crimes against national security, a russion colluder, and many many other things which may harm his electability, should republiQans ever stop being batshit insane.